Democrats Not Idle in New Hampshire

While much of the focus of the presidential campaign is on the Republican candidates stumping around New Hampshire; Democrats are not idle and are launching a large grass roots effort aimed at November. (Jan. 9)

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• new-hampshire

[coachbrp]

Thumbs up if your sick of the bridge and stream shot.

[TheYoungTurdz]

@yourtreat2 Please list when he made recess appointments when congress was not in recess. YOU CAN'T!! He did not!

Obama took us into wars and the only reason we are on the GWB timeline of exit is because they as much as told us to get out of IRAQ. Obama wanted to stay. And stay we should have. Look at it now!! Troops lost their lives for no reason, as we didn't complete the mission.

bho is far worse the gwb.

[1boysinblue]

Dems, Reps, Independants-Who cares? Does it matter?

[yourtreat2]

@TheYoungTurdz GWB after doing as much destruction to the Middle and Lower classes, and engaging us in 2 wars, set the stage for his predecessor to fail

That is not to say that Obama hasn't been as bad a GWB on most issues. Frankly speaking, Obama caved to the Repugnants on everything because he's essentially a Repugnant himself

Even when the Dems had a majority in both Houses and the Administrative branch, Obama did nothing a Repugnant wouldn't have done

I'd agree that Obama's more devious

[TheYoungTurdz]

@Demosthenes0725 Your grammar is atrocious. Bush NEVER pulled the recess appointment when they were NOT on recess. Do you know what proforma means?

Obama has done far more damage than Bush. If Obama could get away with it, we would be socialists.

[Josephdaz1]

@MormonsHateMuslims Is to laugh .. neither do Catholics as the Pope.

[Demosthenes0725]

@TheYoungTurdz & you are wrong as well. Bush has went against the Constitution almost as much as Obama did, & had he the chance would be doing the same thing. Obama couldn't have done so much damage were Bush not there to pave the way for him. They are both authoritarian dictators. & @terabyte30 Bush was appropriately called things worse than king when he was in power, but from the left. & now that a Democrat is in office the left is just as pathetically in denial as the right were with Bush.

[Demosthenes0725]

@terabyte30 lol racist? King =/= Boy. Just b/c Obama's black doesn't mean any derogatory statement about him is racist. He's being equated to a king b/c of the massive executive power he's given himself, & although his rhetoric is not as bad as the Bush Administration's, his actions are even more dictatorial than theirs were.

But apparently Democrats have turned a blind eye to this & blame everyone esle, which is why they can carry an Obama 2012 bumpersticker & not be ashamed like they should

[TheYoungTurdz]

@terabyte30 You also didn't see Bush going around congress, going against our constitution. When you behave like it is a monarchy, you risk being called king and other legal charges to come.

The race card isn't going to place this time around. It has been worn out.

[wongster41]

Democrats would love Mitt to get the nomination, so obama can tear him apart.