Chinese Military S-300 Rocket Failure
Loading...
Link to this comment:
Top Comments
All Comments (84)
-
@andrewfinch1066 What i mean is that Russians invest in simplier weapon systems, which are more reliable. High-tech made in US is still more reliable than Russian high-tech, but most of Russian weapon systems are more reliable than US ones.
For example many or possibly even most of US weapon systems rely on GPS, while GPS systems can be shut down by destroying less than ten satellites.
Also Russian tanks and infantry weapons have an execellent reputation on reliablity.
-
@hjtjl china has purchased the system and is manufacturing its own under the name Hongqi-10. if this one is chinese or russian nobody knows. seems more like chinese to me,considering their reputation haha
-
@BoxyTheSpaceDog these missiles do not degrade with time
-
MADE IN CHINA
-
MADE IN CHINA
-
@DaveSauerkraut Typical dumbass comment. Less advanced does not mean crap...
3 months ago 2
-
Russian military technology is a lot more reliable than US military technology.
-
S-300 is not made in China, it is made in Russia and it is SOVIET TECHNOLOGY
5 months ago 6
-
@kane6ify By the way S-300 is Soviet technology and it is their property, China doesn't manufacture S-300 this video is misleading, The Chinese only bought this from RUSSIA therefore it is not made in China, stupid arse
- 1:12
Russian Club-K Missile System is concealed in a shipping container (RIA novosti)by ConcernAgat42,686 views
- 1:09
S-300by soyouz281,695 views
- 4:16
Army of china 2011-2012by HelloMottoTaiKamu9346,576 views
- 1:01
Iran tests upgraded S-200 missile ایران موشک مشابه اس 300 را آزمایش کردby ardalanhamrah116,503 views
- 5:23
С 300 Мегастрельбы на Ашулукеby zoomer54521,206 views
- 3:52
S-300 (crash)by irondivizion37,626 views
- 7:54
China Military created Super Soldier #1by NPDFremdsprachen88,601 views
- 4:32
The powerful Iran militaryby dietzenbach7777518,189 views
- 1:54
Raytheon - Phalanx Close-In Weapon System (CIWS) & SeaRAM Anti-Ship Missile Defense System [480p]by arronlee33126,210 views
- 0:31
Danger Close IED explosion in Afghanistanby mig353514,477 views
- 1:18
Type 86G New chinese upgraded armoured infantry fighting vehicle with 25 mm automatic gunby armyreco15,395 views
- 0:54
Vanguard TV3 Failed Rocket Launchby NasaCRgis107,484 views
- 4:12
NEW SERBIAby HelloMottoTaiKamu93112,473 views
- 0:42
S-300 destroyed 10 targetsby russiadefence127,298 views
- 1:17
Difference between S-300 and HQ-9by russiadefence1,458 views
- 0:58
S-300 PMU Air Defence Systemby vexed123105,772 views
- 0:55
Indian Brahmos Missile test hits bullseye at speed MACH 2.9+by utubekhiladi67,051 views
- 1:45
Chinese Militaryby ValkyrieOneNiner25,644 views
- 0:57
US: China should explain its intention on military buildup (Feb 18, 2011)by newsupload20102,946 views
There is not technology that 100% fail safe. IMHO it is quite idiotic things say that "this is crap" or similar things. You can find similar videos about USA or European stuiff too.
BTW the most interesting fact in the video the long engine burn time. The original S-300's missile burn time was about 8-9 sec. This had much longer.
molnibalage83 9 months ago 23
@purpleravenstar
Maybe US should resolve quality problem of it's Patriot system.It has almost as much failures as successes in test phase and it was still accepted into service.Here you see one failure out of 100 various S-300 test videos and straight away you assume how inefficient system is,lol.Everyone knows that in training you would use oldest missiles you got in stock and S-300 has been around for a while.
BoxyTheSpaceDog 7 months ago 8