News Blackout as Emma West is Remanded in Custody

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
899 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 7, 2011

The British judicial system is yet again in disgrace as Emma West was remanded in custody on Tuesday the 6th December to appear in Crown Court on January 3rd, 2012! No media outlets have covered the story even though SKY and the BBC and dozens of journalists where at the courts today. Luckily a delegation from London British National Party where there to support Emma and her family and to report on the shocking events.

  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Emma West should have been awarded police protection from the hoards of anti-White haters, not incarcerated.

    As Rhea Page's face found out after being repeatedly kicked to the head by Muslims while collapsed, the judicial system is bent. It's a partial police state now.

    Spread the word: Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.

  • So, what if there had been threats, there has been on youtube, for sure. But the people that has given those threats are the criminals, not Emma West, she has just spoken the truth, she has done no crime.

    Last time I checked on the other hand it was criminal to threaten others with violence, as the anti-Whites has done, not to speak the truth about the elites destroying our nations with letting others invade us.

    this just proves once again: anti-racism is a codeword for anti-White.

see all

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • He is right.

  • Arriba BNP!

    This injustice happens Europe-wide!

    European solidarity!

    EUSSR =/= Europe of fatherlands & nations!

  • great vid

  • The creator of "We are here to stay response to my tram experience" should be prosecuted.

    Section 16 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 treats this as assault, even if it were said only to her and over the phone.

    It likely falls foul of the Communications Act 2003, relating to abusive communications.

    And slander - damage doesn't even need to be proven in public announcements threatening a specified woman's chastity. She should sue.

  • Maybe they are afraid there will beanother holhoax?

  • what is happening to to woman is a disgrace to the country and can happen to you and me,if you are white English/British..

    thanks for the video, i feel very strongly about whats happening to this woman..

    were the Judges white brown ,British ,English.

    its a fucking joke...and we need to help this lady anyway we can...

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more