Why We Don't Need Socialized Medicine

Why we don't need economic illiterates trivializing the dangers of socialized medicine and spouting abject nonsense on YouTube.

This is a rebuttal to the video Why We Need Government-Run Universal Socialized Health Insurance.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• health
• care
• reform
• bill
• single
• payer
• public
• option
• cartoon
• animation
• Andy
• Lubershane
• economic
• illiterate
• commentary
• analysis
• documentary
• graphics software
• video log
• educational
• tips & tricks

[Technosauce]

ONLY THE WEAK AND SCARED DISALLOW THEIR VIDEOS TO BE RATED.

[wormer104]

@General8675 And would you have a means of earning anything if businisses were only just able to stay afloat?

Most agree that when your entire paycheck goes into helping you earn another with no spare cash to go into savings you are in a very bad place.

[K0r0n1s]

God damn it man, you're so limited and your argumentation is so incoherent and your objectivity is nearly non existent. You're twisted, you should get mental healthcare (if you can afford it of course^^). I mean, don't you know, that many of your citizens in USA, until recently, didn't have any healthcare at all? Maybe you should think more outside of your ridiculous ego and not just care that your ass is all fine and the rest can go to hell.

Greetings: A German/Polish socialist thug ;-)

[kingofcarrotflwrs]

a idiotic response to an idiotic video. that is all.

[Etheoma]

for life of me I don't know why the rich are against this, do you just hate them. and want them to die. because your spending quiet a lot of money 30% of what you pay in insurance and probably 20%ish that you pay in taxes. and yes you pay for these people in taxes because uninsured people still get treated, so your paying for it already just formalize it and make it public.

[Etheoma]

OUWWWW you hurt my brain, not because you make a complicated argument but because your argument is retarded.

american Healthcare is the most expensive in the world and out of the developed contraries gets some of the WORST results.

explain that, just explain it pleas I would like to know how 100% compared to united kingdoms health care just goes missing, *PUFF* 1/2 your money gone now you do better 50% better than the UK and cut spending by 25% per captia and you get to keep that money.

[Researchrules]

From the point of view of the consumer advertising and administrative overhead lower efficiency as less funds will be available to increase the quality of their goods and services.

[Researchrules]

Also efficiency can be defined by all stakeholders from their Point Of View.Each part of the transaction has an efficiency score in mind. Employees have a pound-per-hour score, suppliers have a pound-per-product score, customers have utility-per-pound score and investors have a pound-per-pound-of-investment score.

[Researchrules]

So you claim that high administrative costs increase efficiency? Where did you take your economic class? Efficiency is a function between input and output, so a high administrative overhead means less funds return to the consumers. Administrative overhead is not even a part of the product cost.