God Who Wasn't There Rebuttal Part 2

I go through a clip of "The God Who Wasn't There" (as well as "Zeitgeist") and disprove it point-by-point. For more information, and a written form of this critique, please visit BabylonIsFallen.net ...Thanks!

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• god
• who
• wasn't
• there
• zeitgeist
• christianity
• atheism
• debate
• christian

[robbocox1981]

Which detail in the bible has been proven accurate? Just because you say this, does not make it true. Example please?!

[xjoseywales]

So the fact that the media in a majority Christian country doesn't dispute the Bible more often proves it's legitimacy is proof enough for you that it is true? Then by your standards Islam must be true as well if it is not criticized in Muslim countries. As to the "historians" that find history matches the NT/OT Bible. I think you will find history matches the Bible when the research is conducted by people that have a conformation bias to make it match and that it's not a consensus generally.

[robtay1963]

@espyd21c I love it when a christian actually says to me, the Pharaoh that sent moses into the dessert said," Let the name of Moses be stricken from every stone and every scroll and every tablet", so they conclude that our argument of no historical proof of moses is inaccurate. I would say firstly if that was in the bible it could have been placed there when it was written, which like all stories was long after supposed events, and second that line came only from the Charlton Heston movie.

[Scaly420]

One thing I can't stand about society is how everyone always needs proof for everything. Problem with proof is that a lot of times it can have the appearance of being accurate simply by using misguided information that is either twisted truth, or false claims altogether. How's this for an example of God's existence? We all know air is real. We feel it, we breathe it. So is it possible that God applies the same way spiritually? The only catch is that one must seek him with all their heart to find

[Scaly420]

HIM

[stevenpina1983]

matt. 27:52, 53 is not referring to a resurrection but merely dead bodies being thrown out of the grave from the earth shaking

[MegaJay79]

@revdionysus You use the Bible 'the book of Acts' as your rebuttlal but this makes no sense as this was written in Greece 60 odd yrs after the events, if it was written during the lost years you would have a point.

Also there are no Roman or Jewish Historians who confirm the events of the New Testament

[wayamat]

fail

[kruszer]

Matt. 27:52-53 says that when Jesus resurrected many people rose from their graves, "went into the city and appeared to many". If this really happened, why does no one else (not even the other gospel writers or apostles) mention this? Dead people showing up to their relatives and friends doesn't cause enough of a stir for historians everywhere to take note?? Sure smells of fiction to me.

[espyd21c]

no modern egyptologist will agree that the pyramids were built by slaves. just my two cents because i found exception to the statement that the bible is historicly accurate because it is not.

[sotospap1]

@POC777 research that doesn;t have the correct references is simply a lie.

All the serious research has references to the books that it used.

That you don't provide any official references proves that what you say its just words, word words.



[POC777]

@sotospap1

For what so you could mock my research no thank you.