Sensible, controlled, consensual, immigration can build national pride and patriotism. Immigration only has negative social affects when it is uncontrolled, unnecessary, non-consensual or economically/morally unwise.
@MysteryOfTheFence "Restricting bonuses and the financial sector is far harder in a more globalised world." Harder, slightly, agreeing to global commitments is far from impossible."limiting immigration; FMC prefers freedom of movement of labour to benefit global capital "It is socialised healthcare + ageing population that creates a young-workers deficit which is then filled by immigration. The young are brought into work for the government's social experiments.
@codownni The nature of global FMC inevitably reduces the power of national governments and hinders their ability to plan on a national level. e.g. Restricting bonuses and the financial sector is far harder in a more globalised world.
Patriotism enshrines supposed unique virtues in the national character and seeks to protect the nation by limiting immigration; FMC prefers freedom of movement of labour to benefit global capital.
Free-market capitalism erodes national identity? You mean certain avoidable aspects of fmc does? Why would one have to choose between patriotism and free market? Is it impossible to be a patriotic capitalist? What does choosing between fmc and patriotism have to do with national sovereignty?
Some excellent points from Nina Power about the de-professionalising of care work. The Big Society favours an exploitative idea of work for the social good not being rewarded by pay. Ludicrous.
@sparky6952 And the world would be put to rights if narrow-minded, insular and anti-intellectual UKIP folk were in power, I assume? Pro-free market capitalists who complain about national sovereignty being eroded are missing a rather central point.
@MysteryOfTheFence
Sensible, controlled, consensual, immigration can build national pride and patriotism. Immigration only has negative social affects when it is uncontrolled, unnecessary, non-consensual or economically/morally unwise.
codownni 3 weeks ago
@MysteryOfTheFence "Restricting bonuses and the financial sector is far harder in a more globalised world." Harder, slightly, agreeing to global commitments is far from impossible."limiting immigration; FMC prefers freedom of movement of labour to benefit global capital "It is socialised healthcare + ageing population that creates a young-workers deficit which is then filled by immigration. The young are brought into work for the government's social experiments.
codownni 3 weeks ago
@codownni The nature of global FMC inevitably reduces the power of national governments and hinders their ability to plan on a national level. e.g. Restricting bonuses and the financial sector is far harder in a more globalised world.
Patriotism enshrines supposed unique virtues in the national character and seeks to protect the nation by limiting immigration; FMC prefers freedom of movement of labour to benefit global capital.
MysteryOfTheFence 3 weeks ago
@MysteryOfTheFence
Free-market capitalism erodes national identity? You mean certain avoidable aspects of fmc does? Why would one have to choose between patriotism and free market? Is it impossible to be a patriotic capitalist? What does choosing between fmc and patriotism have to do with national sovereignty?
codownni 3 weeks ago
@codownni Free-market capitalism erodes national identity - which is as inevitable as chilly weather in the north-east of England in January!
To be at all consistent, right-wingers have to choose between patriotism and the free market.
MysteryOfTheFence 3 weeks ago
@MysteryOfTheFence
what central point is that?
codownni 3 weeks ago
''can we pay somebody else to do our job?''
felixcock 4 weeks ago
Some excellent points from Nina Power about the de-professionalising of care work. The Big Society favours an exploitative idea of work for the social good not being rewarded by pay. Ludicrous.
MysteryOfTheFence 1 month ago
The 'Scar-Girls'!? The Sun really is a moronic paper.
MysteryOfTheFence 1 month ago
@sparky6952 And the world would be put to rights if narrow-minded, insular and anti-intellectual UKIP folk were in power, I assume? Pro-free market capitalists who complain about national sovereignty being eroded are missing a rather central point.
MysteryOfTheFence 1 month ago