Upload

Famous Atheist Antony Flew Changes Mind, Believes in God

shadfewl shadfewl·56 videos
133

Subscription preferences

Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Working...
171,226
Like     Dislike 501

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like shadfewl's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike shadfewl's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add shadfewl's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Mar 9, 2007

Stunning revelation of how famous atheist Dr. Antony Flew has come to conclusion after seeing new evidence and devout reflection of his studies to find none other than that God exists.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

All Comments (4,836)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • guitardudeguy00

    You look at something you don't understand and think about how it must be intelligent. It's possible that the laws of nature could be better... you can't prove that idea wrong or right or you can't prove god's existence or non existence. Another thought experiment: does god understand the things that man builds? If you claim he understands the laws of physics, that doesn't allow you to claim he understands their APPLICATION. To do so would be bias... so do you have any proof of this?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate guitardudeguy00's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate guitardudeguy00's comment.
    in reply to DontCloudMe Please (Show the comment)
  • DontCloudMe Please

    More importantly, it must be consented that the intelligence is much greater than ours. If it weren't, we would have complete mastery over the universe.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate DontCloudMe Please's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate DontCloudMe Please's comment.
  • DontCloudMe Please

    There is clearly intelligence in the design, therefore the design is indisputably intelligent.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate DontCloudMe Please's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate DontCloudMe Please's comment.
  • AJweathersby

    Few hundred? Try thousands. And that percentage would change if you asked scientists if they believe in macroevolution. Everyone agrees animals change overtime. What's in question is whether or not they change to the point of generating new species. That's where the disagreement starts.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate AJweathersby's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate AJweathersby's comment.
    in reply to Proof4Truth (Show the comment)
  • AJweathersby

    I hesitate to rate the Big Bang Theory as goingaainst the Bible, as a christian priest originally created the theory in the first place, to explain how god made the universe. The thoery was altered to favor naturalist thinking. And all the theories you listed that go against the Bible are questionable and unlikely at absolute best.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate AJweathersby's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate AJweathersby's comment.
    in reply to Proof4Truth (Show the comment)
  • Proof4Truth

    You say Evolution is the ONLY scientific theory that goes against the bible and then you bring up the Big Bang in the same breath. There are dozens if not hundreds of theories that go against every piece of the creation story alone. Age of the Earth, Order in which things were created, How the Earth was created, How humanity came into existence, etc. And that's not even getting into other items like archaeological finds that dispute the gospels...

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Proof4Truth's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Proof4Truth's comment.
    in reply to AJweathersby (Show the comment)
  • Proof4Truth

    There is no hot debate. Evolution is not a "theory" in the way you presented it. Your few hundred scientists represent .023% of scientists. 99.9% of scientists accept evolution. Darwin's "Theory" of evolution is not a question as to whether evolution happens...the evidence is overwhelming that it does if you look at ALL the evidence and not just the evidence presented by people that agree with you. Darwin's "Theory" of evolution is a theory as to HOW it happens...not whether or not it happens.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Proof4Truth's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Proof4Truth's comment.
    in reply to AJweathersby (Show the comment)
  • smithn383

    Even the best of us can get fooled by bullshit sometimes....

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate smithn383's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate smithn383's comment.
  • ThinkingBetter

    Logical understanding is what drives mainstream science and mainstream science is having a wide consensus on evolution. It's not that I don't understand the arguments against evolution setup by creationists. The problem with the arguments is that they are flawed and debunked endlessly. If you had an argument that was valid against evolution, you would be the first one. Totally dumb arguments are still used like "evolution violates the second law of thermodynamics". It's totally ignorant.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ThinkingBetter's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ThinkingBetter's comment.
    in reply to 356designer (Show the comment)
  • finalfantasy8VIII

    No sensible person would be convinced by this 'everything is so complicated, oh my god!' argument. Ignorance might be bliss but it is also stupid. These are exactly the type of arguments Flew rejected when he was in his prime, its sad really.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate finalfantasy8VIII's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate finalfantasy8VIII's comment.
    in reply to 356designer (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Advertisement
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later