The existence of God proven

By very definition we would call the creator of the universe

God
a : the Being perfect in power, wisdom, and goodness who is worshipped as creator and ruler of the universe

Merriam-Webster, I. (2003). Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary. (Eleventh ed.). Springfield, Mass.: Merriam-Webster, Inc.

GOOD REASONS TO AFFIRM THE GOD OF THE BIBLE IS THE GOD WHO TRULY EXISTS
Now that the God of the Bible and the God of theistic arguments are known to share many of the same unique characteristics, it remains to demonstrate that they must be one and the same God. Three arguments emerge, the first two of which are based on the unique characteristics of God held by all theists.
THERE CANNOT BE TWO INFINITE GODS
Both the Bible and the cosmological argument used to establish Gods existence show that he is infinite. But there cannot be two infinite beings. Therefore, both the God of the Bible and the God of rational theism are one and the same being. Further, the God of theism has been shown by good reason to actually exist. Hence, the God described in the Bible actually exists.
The burden of this argument rests on the premise that it is impossible to have two infinite beings. To argue that there are two infinite beings is like claiming there are two alls. But there can only be one all. It is like claiming there are two supremes, when it is obvious that only one being can be supreme. Or more precisely, infinite means without limits. If there are two beings, then one is limited by the other in some way. But an infinite cannot be limited by another, since it is unlimited by its very nature. Hence, there can be only one infinite (limitless) being.
THERE CANNOT BE TWO ABSOLUTELY PERFECT GODS
In like manner, there cannot be two absolutely perfect beings. In order to have two beings, one must differ from the other, otherwise they would be the same. In order to differ in perfection, however, one being would have to have a perfection that the other did not have. The one that lacked this perfection would not be absolutely perfect, since it would be lacking in perfection. Therefore, there can be only one absolutely perfect being. If the God of the Bible is absolutely perfect as is the God of the moral argument, then they are one and the same God.
THERE CANNOT BE TWO PURE ACTUALITIES

Another attribute shared by both the God of the Bible and the God of rational theism is pure actuality. Reason demands that God cannot have any potentiality in his being. If he did, then he would need a cause, since no potency is self-actualizing. But he needs no cause, since he is the first cause. He is self-existent, independent of all other beings. Thus, the God of the cosmological argument must be pure existence (actuality), as the great theists claimed he was.
Pure actuality is absolutely unique. There cannot be two such beings, for the only way for one being to differ in essence from another being is by potentiality. That is, one being has a potential (to be something) that the other does not have. But a being of pure actuality has no potentiality whatsoever. Hence, it cannot differ from another being of pure actuality.
Thus, there can be one and only one being who is pure actuality, such as both the God of reason and the God of Scripture are known to be.

Principle of causality:
Defense of the Principle. An Undeniable Truth. If the principle of causality is stated, Every effect has a cause, then it is undeniable.
In this form the principle of causality is analytically self-evident, since by an effect is meant what is caused and by a cause is meant what produces the effect. Hence, the predicate is reducible to the subject. It is like saying, Every triangle has three sides.

IF EVERYTHING NEEDS A CAUSE,
THEN WHAT CAUSED GOD?

This question comes up a lot. The problem is that people dont listen well to what we have to say. We didnt say that everything needs a cause; we said everything that has a beginning needs a cause. Only finite, contingent things need a cause. God didnt have a beginning; He is infinite and He is necessary. God is the uncaused cause of all finite things. If God needed a cause, we would begin an infinite regress of causes that would never answer the question. As it is, we cant ask, Who caused God? because God is the first cause. You cant go back any farther than a first.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• The existence of God proven
• Atheism
• Theism
• Apologetics

[AbbeyRoadkill1]

The real proof of God is that I get a warm feeling in my tummy every time I think of Him. So-- it's time for all you athiests/nonbelievers to bow down and fear the wrath of my loving God!

[Aydosh1991]

This is not proof, only conjecture.

[AthosAmo]

@upisoft2 You're proud for no good reason. If you were proud and smart, at least you'd have some reason for being conceited. Yet you scram here in pride because you can't back up your lie that I said that "all things that interact naturally and supernaturally" are the universe.

[AthosAmo]

@upisoft2 You said that if I continued name-calling, that I would be "more stupid," thus accusing me of being stupid, stupid hypocrite.

You argue against God, and are too cowardly to say what you believe, so you must be a liar, atheist. At the very least you are an atheist in practice.

I can bring up God because this is a video concerning God, idiot.

[upisoft2]

@upisoft2 Also for some time you are not discussing what we were discussing, so I have no interest to discuss it any longer. Be nice, say bye.

Bye.

[upisoft2]

@AthosAmo Oh, you made another mistake. I'm not agnostic either. You may continue calling me names, that will get you nothing. Except another short lecture that doing so is stupid. Also telling the truth that name calling is stupid is not hypocrisy. You just called me "hypocrite", because you have no real arguments. Instead you continue to play you goalpost moving game, now defining entities like "Divine", "spirits", etc. which were no part of our discussion.

[AthosAmo]

@upisoft2 Isn't it ironic that you say that my calling you an atheist (what a horrible insult!) will not help me at all, even though immediately afterwards you say that by doing so I "will be more stupid"? Hypocrite.

[AthosAmo]

@upisoft2 And to clarify, the "us" that is part of the universe is just our physical us- our bodies. There is an "us" which is not part of the universe, which is the "us" as spirits. So not all of us is part of the universe. So I didn't define (or "redefine") the universe as including the spiritual.

[AthosAmo]

@upisoft2 Agnostics are atheists. What are you doing here arguing against the existence of the Divine if you're not an atheist, which is someone who does not believe in the Divine? You lied. I did not say that "all things that interact naturally and supernaturally" are the universe. If that were so, God would be part of the universe. God the Father and the Holy Spirit are not part of nature. You say "bye" because you know you lied and can't do anything about your exposure.