Tim Walberg has been fighting for our children's future by working to improve economic opportunities and protect our children from Internet predators. His opponent, Mark Schauer, has repeatedly raised taxes in Michigan, driving hope and opportunity for our children out of our state. Instead of cracking down on Internet predators, Schauer voted against a bill that would prohibit adults from knowingly sending sexually explicit material to minors over the Internet.
Wake up people.
Walberg's "bold solution" to fix our economy is to blame someone else and talk about a guy who makes movies.
Walberg admitted that he's "bought and paid for" by the Club for Growth, an anti-tax, pro-business group.
Walberg has supported free trade deals and the outsourcing of jobs during his first term in Congress, voting with Bush/Cheney 93 percent of the time!
Vote for Mark Schauer and the change we need in Washington!
Pfaendtner 3 years ago
Walberg's campaign is full of lies, and he will lose his seat in November. I don't know anyone who has publicly stated that they will vote for Walberg. It will be good to see him gone!!!
SSchus87 3 years ago
I imagine the same thing being said by those who wanted to keep slavery and deny women the right to vote. Fortunately, wiser minds prevailed.
snelldl 3 years ago
I think it takes more backbone to stand up for the rule of law than to cast a meaningless vote for an unconstitutional bill.
howardad 3 years ago
Exactly, Schauer voted against the bill after the House Fiscal Agency stated in it's findings that the bill was most certainly unconstitutional and would likely be struck down if enacted into law.
cnjalvarez4 3 years ago
This is a disgusting ad. I expect better from someone who claims to be a pastor. Maybe he doesn't consider himself to be one anymore.
didaskalos2007 3 years ago
Nice "approval" message from "Pastor" Tim. Is he serious?
didaskalos2007 3 years ago
Can't wait to watch Walberg give up his seat on Nov. 4th.
missiu 3 years ago
I'm sour on Schauer! >:-(
LegoStarWarsGuy 3 years ago
Well, it's too bad he didn't have enough backbone to vote for tougher restrictions anyway.
snelldl 3 years ago