Logic Is Never The Answer

When dealing with the unreasonable, it's best to take an unreasonable approach.

A response to this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0cWjZTWRbM

By:
http://www.youtube.com/user/notfitforsociety

Category:

Education

Tags:

• logic
• reason
• truthers
• creationists
• pseudoscience
• dishonesty
• emotion

[Klaa2]

Being unreasonable and dishonest in response to someone you perceive as not being logical makes very little sense.

All you've done here is prove that you are willing to resort to maligning people you disagree with, instead of address the facts they have put forward - which you've compleatly ignored.

This type of circular logic to defend your own bias is not logical or reasonable, it's merely the hallmark of a guy that's a douchebag.

Have a little intellectual integrity. It won't kill you.

[h8uall66]

@Klaa2

You missed the point.

[Klaa2]

@h8uall66

Seriously, give up. You've already shown you have zero integrity.

[h8uall66]

@Klaa2

How so?

[Klaa2]

@h8uall66

I have already stated why.  Have some integrity. Your understanding of "science" is indistinguishable from religion. You do not actually comprehend, you merely parrot.

Attempt to prove your own assumptions wrong, and you might have some chance. Otherwise, your'e just a poser and a mere internet troll.

[h8uall66]

@Klaa2

No, you really haven't stated anything. You've merely asserted that I have no integrity without backing your statement up. I know what my video was about because I made it. I also know the context under which the video was made, something you can't know because the video that this is a response to was deleted. So you're coming into the conversation half way and making a bunch of assumptions. How am I supposed to take that seriously?

[h8uall66]

@tuzmor

Would you mind crying like a little bitch somewhere else? I prefer to talk to adults that can clearly articulate their thoughts and ideas. Thanks.

[Area612]

Sorry, would not allow me to post these articles in full. A good site for reading is

911research.wtc7.net

Cheers.

[Area612]

Frank Demartini's Statement

Frank A. Demartini, on-site construction manager for the World Trade Center, spoke of the resilience of the towers in an interview recorded on January 25, 2001.

The building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it. That was the largest plane at the time. I believe that the building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door -- this intense grid -- and the jet plane is ju

[Area612]

John Skilling

John Skilling was the head structural engineer for the World Trade Center. In a 1993 interview, Skilling stated that the Towers were designed to withstand the impact and fires resulting from the collision of a large jetliner such as Boeing 707 or Douglas DC-8.

Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed, ... The building structure