Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Brother Dan Holman and The Little Rock Police Story

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
150 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 10, 2011

Brother Dan Holman and his wife Donna from Keokuk, IA are in Little Rock, AR this week to stand against the spirit of abortion. They have with them Kayla Bradham, a mother of seven, who has with her a 13 year old daughter Michaela, her 5 month old son Barnabas and an 11 yearl old friend Lucretia Nyhart; all from Milwaukee, WI.
They are all a part of a Christian Ministry that sends missionaries to the pre-borns. They are in Little Rock to support the Operation Save America and their States of Refuge program to see the only remaining surgical abortion mill in Arkansas closed; in the Name of Jesus.
Brother Holman, wife and friends relate an incident as they recall that happened yesterday with a woman, who they later found out to be a plain clothes officer, who was following them as they were driving in their van. Dan claims that the woman had a handgun in hand, and never identified herself as a law enforcement officer. It was not until a police officer arrived on the scene after Brother Dan called 911 that Brother Dan became aware that the woman with a gun and her hand on the trigger was actually a law enforcement officer. Brother Dan recorded the entire incident for his own protection. After all Brother Dan is traveling with his wife and friends doing a controversial ministry against the evils of abortionl. Babies are being killed in America. Some people in America is supportive of a woman's legal rights to kill her own child, but saints like Brother Dan and crew are willing to put their own lives in danger to expose the truth of the abortion industry. Thank you Brother Dan and all.
After reviewing Dan's video of the incident this uploader determined that the plain clothes woman officer actually did identify herself as a police officer, and Dan may not have heard he say so. But it is fairly clear on the video that the officer did identify herself. Dan may have been jumping to conclusions in the heat of the matter.
Go to thomhuey@hotmail.com for comments, questions, and/or prayer requests

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (whatthingssoever)

  • Maybe you should have kept your zellet, baby saving ass in the truck instead of getting out with a weapon..or a hammer or whatever could cause bodily harm. Wack job.

  • @rb15026 What would you have done?

  • It's "DEJA VU" not "DEJA JEW" you racists. These guys are about one bubble off center.

  • @rb15026 "These guys"? Who you calling "These guys"? Does that include me?

    What does race have to do with anything?

    "racists"? Who are you calling a raciest?

    Just trying to bring you out so the world can know what you believe and who you are.

    Those of us in the Pro-Life camp stand for life.

    God said "I put before you life and death; choose life so that you and your child will live."

    God is both Pro-Life and Pro-Choice.

    He gives us all the free will to choose and tells us what he wants.

see all

All Comments (9)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 3- department time, and for drawing a gun on law-abiding citizens in a van full of granny and the kids. The police know they are guilty of what is legally known as tort, malfeasance, breach of duty, terrorism, and endangering public safety. That's why they were quick to hide as much evidence as possible by destroying their tapes of the event. They don't want to be sued, they don't want to be thrown out of office, and they don't want to have to pay damages. They'd rather act like little Nazis.

  • 2- her excuse. If 'being' a policewoman is reason to follow around anybody, why wasn't she following around the passersby who equally hadn't violated any law? She was obviously targeting the Holmans because of their First Amendment protected message against abortion, and she was obviously not enforcing the law but enforcing her personal political beliefs while using police employment as a camouflage. A competent police chief would fire her in a second for doing personal business on police

  • 1- Holman had violated no law, and so the police woman had no grounds whatsoever to be tailing him-- much less with a gun in her hands. Her secretive stalking (without a uniform or marked car) also extended to beyond Little Rock city limits, which further showed she was working on personal malice and not on legitimate police business. With her muttering her "identification" against the background noise of the traffic no rational person would expect a 65-year-old like Holman to be able to hear

  • Stand strong in the Lord and the power of His might. The Lord be with you everyday.

  • Thanks for this video. It proves we are living in truly evil times.

    Blessings in Yeshua 

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more