Part 4 - Scientist David Archibald continues to examine the effect of sunspot cycles that correlate with global temperatures. The conclusion is contradictory to Al Gore and environmentalists believ...
Part 4 - Scientist David Archibald continues to examine the effect of sunspot cycles that correlate with global temperatures. The conclusion is contradictory to Al Gore and environmentalists believing global warming & Climate change are an issue to be concerned about
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
BTW, the new NASA GISS website is quite impressive. If you wish to see it, google "Climate Change: Key Indicators" And guess what? 11 of the last 12 years were the hottest in history since 1860.
**what do you think of the Urban Heat Island Effect? That issue is always a good litmus test to see which side someone is on** It's absolute rubbish as is Average global Temature Trends of only 40 wwaether stations to represent the "Whole World" against CO2 measurements only from Muana Loa on the rise to "prove" Humans are causing "Glo al Warming" by burning fossil fuels. Why? 1) Prove that Co2 rise is from burning fossil fuels 2) Prove CO2 causes AGT rise(a fucken statistical figure)
oh boy, now you've put your foot in it. read what skepticalscience com/argument.php has to say about the urban heat island effect. there are so many counter-arguments. in particular, ocean surface temperatures also show a warming trend.
no one said there's no urban heat island effect. if you read my reference you would see that. the effect is well known and more than compensated for in the most temperature analyses. there are other non-urban sources of temperature data that have shown warming trends. read the reference it's not 'just another blog'. How is it any less relevent than the sources you use to backup your paranoid biases?
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
If you wish to see it, google "Climate Change: Key Indicators"
And guess what? 11 of the last 12 years were the hottest in history since 1860.
It's absolute rubbish as is Average global Temature Trends of only 40 wwaether stations to represent the "Whole World" against CO2 measurements only from Muana Loa on the rise to "prove" Humans are causing "Glo al Warming" by burning fossil fuels.
Why?
1) Prove that Co2 rise is from burning fossil fuels
2) Prove CO2 causes AGT rise(a fucken statistical figure)
You and this blog say there is no Urban Heat Island Effect? Who cares?
If you want to believe these blogs--good for you, i wont try to convince you otherwise.
this isnt a counter argument--only for the weak minded it is
is warming still happening?
how can who they are, their education, body of work, etc., have nothing to do with what they claim?