What got ME banned from conservapedia?

This is what I posted on the talk page of the evolution article and was banned for.

--------------

Hitler was a Roman Catholic, the holocaust was done in the name of god, read Mein Kampf. They're using an appeal to emotion, irrelevant

It doesn't matter if 99% of all US citizens reject evolution, fact is not democratic, this would only serve to put us behind Turkey as the least biologically inclined first world country. They're using an argument from popularity, irrelevant.

"The theory of evolution posits a process of self-transformation from simple life forms to more complex life forms, which has never been observed or duplicated in a laboratory."

It's not really self transformation, its driven largely by the environment, anyway, observed increases in complexity via evolution include but are certainly not limited to the nylon bug, cit+ E. Coli, culex mosquito, hedylepta. They're using an argument from ignorance, irrelevant.

"The great intellectuals in history such as Archimedes, Aristotle, St. Augustine, Francis Bacon, Isaac Newton, and Lord Kelvin did not propose an evolutionary process for a species to transform into a more complex version"

Nor did they propose the theory of relativity.

"Theory of Evolution and Little Consensus" See; Project Steve


"Dr. Stephen Meyer published an article favoring intelligent design in a peer reviewed science journal which had traditionally only published material advocating the evolutionary position."

On 4 August 2004, an article by Meyer appeared in the peer-reviewed scientific journal, Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington. On 7 September, the publisher of the journal, the Council of the Biological Society of Washington, released a statement retracting the article as not having met its scientific standards and not peer reviewed.

"A notable case of a scientists using fraudulent material to promote the theory of evolution was the work of German scientist and atheist Ernst Haeckel."

Only 6 of his over 100 drawings were at all embellished due to lack of visual reference, what we know now with the ability to take photomicrographs is that embellishment was unnecessary, human embryos DO have pharyngeal pouches identical to fish embryo gills, human embryos DO have tails, whale embryos DO have legs, these are facts confirmed by modern science.

DNA alone spectacularly confirms common descent beyond any doubt, see; chromosome 2, the vitamin C synthesis gene, the human-chimp genome project.

I will expand this when I have time, if this comment isn't deleted for debunking most of the main page in about 15 lines. If you really had any valid arguments against evolution, not just arguments from incredulity and appeals to emotion, the page would be open to editing.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• god
• christianity
• christian
• apologetics
• clipboard
• evolution
• creationism
• intelligent
• design
• DNA
• genetics
• fossil
• record
• transitional
• forms
• ben
• stein
• charles
• darwin
• conservapedia
• debate
• richard
• dawkins
• michael
• behe
• ken
• miller
• kent
• hovind
• ham

[craigore2011]

"What got me banned from Conservapedia"

Using sense and reason?

[Doryreed]

@TruthIsLife7 REALLY?!? Ok so what evidence do you think there is for a creator? And how do you explain transitional fossils, new anti-biotic resistance in bacteria, the similarities in the genetic code between related individuals etc. We have many facts which together make a convincing case for the origin of the universe and evolution. However every single time someone has claimed to have evidence of a god or creator it has been proved to be false.

[slicingwater]

I was banned for "uncivility"

[scientific]

@HConstantine If they didn't lie they would have nothing at all.

[HConstantine]

@linuxisbetter0 Hitler did not believe in evolution. He banned Darwin's books. Try not lying.

[HConstantine]

Actually, Augustine does seem to accept something like evolution (in his On the Literal Meaning of Genesis), following Empedocles perhaps.

[HYEYBT]

"The only way to vandalize Conservapedia is to post facts."

-An anonymous 4chan poster

[LostManSays]

@craigore2011 Or actual facts.

[truvelocity]

@thefinalfrontier1701 Nylonase bacteria eat nylon. Nylon is a man made invention. Evolution is observed. No, life doesn't materialize. It is a natural process for molecules to bond and self replicate. RNA is a natural process. It self replicates and is non living and is made up of the molecules you can find in any asteroid. Life is a natural process. Evolution explains it with predictable, testable, peer review. I challenge any creationist to explain plant speciation without evolution.

[linuxisbetter0]

@WillGo7

Did you read the article on Positive Christianity?

"was a slogan of Nazi propaganda...to express a worldview which is Christian, non-confessional, vigorously opposed to the spirit of "Jewish Materialism"..."

Essentially it's exactly what I described before...it was Hitler using anything, in this case religion, for propaganda. He also used evolution, Nietzsche, astronomy for the same purpose.

Not compelling 'evidence' to suggest "the holocaust was done in the name of god" AT ALL.

[WillGo7]

@linuxisbetter0 look up wikipedia Adolf Hitler's religious views. there you go, particularly the part about "a 'positive cristianity', purged of judaism and instilled with Nazi philosophy." Sorry I don't currently have access to scholarly articles. If you don't find this sufficient, well, too bad.