Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Face to Face with Dr. Niels Harrit

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,191
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 10, 2011

"There is no doubt that this building was taken down in a controlled demolition... there is no way around this conclusion." States Dr. Niels Harrit referring to World Trade Center Building 7.
Dr. Niels Harrit (retired associate professor of chemistry) and his team at the University of Copenhagen published a paper in The Open Chemical Physics Journal and verified that red/grey particles of non-reacted nanothermite was found in the dust of the WTC buildings. This finding is irrevocable proof -- the veritable DNA -- that "Office Fires" and jet planes did not bring down the three buildings on that fateful day. 9/11 has been the prima facie excuse for incursions of the U.S. and NATO into foreign nations, the sole justification for suspension of our domestic civil liberties and the common denominator of "The War on Terror".

This interview traces Dr. Harrit's personal and professional journey into and through the events of 9/11 and beyond.



© 2011 Lazarus Productions

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (ictvvictoria)

  • We can all argue about fine and rough details -- and proffer detailed or undetailed analysis of the physics of that fateful day -- but we suggest the focus should also include the "facts" of the "Official Story" via FEMA, The 9/11 Commission and NIST -- all of whom purport that "office fires" were responsible. The option of controlled demolition was utterly and virtually left out of the collapse hypothesis.  Most important, WTC 7 was NOT hit by an aircraft or substantial debris from WTC 1 & 2.

Top Comments

  • You are a good man Dr Niel Harrit...thank you for these excellent interview.

  • @RG2057 thats the dumbest thing ive ever heard. honestly.

see all

All Comments (29)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • They got away with it. Get over it. The American public are a bunch of cowards.

  • @ictvvictoria That is another that I got post. he/she grieves that here doesn't accept the links;

    tms.org/pubs/journals/jom/0112­­/eagar/eagar-0112.html

  • @ictvvictoria Excuse the delay. Engineers have to work. As it is impossible here to type what know on the towers and WTC7, I indicate engineering sites. I only get to post that site. The others are obstructed. type in the google that you will find. Not only him as well as several engineering sites on the 9/11. It has even at my country. nobody knows them that it helps such conspiracy: debunking911

  • @ictvvictoria against the such conspiracy. And him nor close to NY it was, therefore the Engineering is Universal. Now as I´ll type him here what do I know? I would be hours and hours! ! Do you have hate of the bush? me also! he invaded Iraq removing troops of Afghanistan without permission of UN. Only to avenge the father and to steal the oil. Giving breath to Al Qaeda and talibã. Only lack you he to say that they didn't deserve to wash candy!

  • @ictvvictoria I inform that puppet is not! I´m not is ignorant to technical facts happened in the 9/11. The documentation generated by the happened swept all of the engineering universities. Here only who agree with you´re the ones that has hate to the empire yankee and they are for Iran, Cuba, venezuela, Korea of the north and other. The one that I know took 2 hours with 1 lecture on Metallic Structures. And in the audience he had some like you. they were massacred by the Teacher's arguments

  • @aczjbr

    OK. But how do you explain the free fall of Building 7 in 6.5 seconds into its own footprint? Eh?

    The real issue is the cover-up. NIST and FEMA say the "collapse" was solely due to "office fires". The "Official Commission" report didn't even bother to comment on Building 7.

    Doesn't this bother you?

    Why do people continually defend a government that clearly doesn't give a shit about them?

    Can you say "paid shills???"

  • @ctcole77 other eye witnesses say that the plane appeared as if it were landing, and came in slow. he claimed tuihat he saw the plane for a total of 10 seconds and that was at the gas station and anex building.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more