Face to Face with Dr. Niels Harrit
Uploader Comments (ictvvictoria)
Top Comments
-
You are a good man Dr Niel Harrit...thank you for these excellent interview.
-
@RG2057 thats the dumbest thing ive ever heard. honestly.
All Comments (29)
-
They got away with it. Get over it. The American public are a bunch of cowards.
-
@ictvvictoria That is another that I got post. he/she grieves that here doesn't accept the links;
tms.org/pubs/journals/jom/0112
/eagar/eagar-0112.html -
@ictvvictoria Excuse the delay. Engineers have to work. As it is impossible here to type what know on the towers and WTC7, I indicate engineering sites. I only get to post that site. The others are obstructed. type in the google that you will find. Not only him as well as several engineering sites on the 9/11. It has even at my country. nobody knows them that it helps such conspiracy: debunking911
-
@ictvvictoria against the such conspiracy. And him nor close to NY it was, therefore the Engineering is Universal. Now as I´ll type him here what do I know? I would be hours and hours! ! Do you have hate of the bush? me also! he invaded Iraq removing troops of Afghanistan without permission of UN. Only to avenge the father and to steal the oil. Giving breath to Al Qaeda and talibã. Only lack you he to say that they didn't deserve to wash candy!
-
@ictvvictoria I inform that puppet is not! I´m not is ignorant to technical facts happened in the 9/11. The documentation generated by the happened swept all of the engineering universities. Here only who agree with you´re the ones that has hate to the empire yankee and they are for Iran, Cuba, venezuela, Korea of the north and other. The one that I know took 2 hours with 1 lecture on Metallic Structures. And in the audience he had some like you. they were massacred by the Teacher's arguments
-
OK. But how do you explain the free fall of Building 7 in 6.5 seconds into its own footprint? Eh?
The real issue is the cover-up. NIST and FEMA say the "collapse" was solely due to "office fires". The "Official Commission" report didn't even bother to comment on Building 7.
Doesn't this bother you?
Why do people continually defend a government that clearly doesn't give a shit about them?
Can you say "paid shills???"
-
@ctcole77 other eye witnesses say that the plane appeared as if it were landing, and came in slow. he claimed tuihat he saw the plane for a total of 10 seconds and that was at the gas station and anex building.
We can all argue about fine and rough details -- and proffer detailed or undetailed analysis of the physics of that fateful day -- but we suggest the focus should also include the "facts" of the "Official Story" via FEMA, The 9/11 Commission and NIST -- all of whom purport that "office fires" were responsible. The option of controlled demolition was utterly and virtually left out of the collapse hypothesis. Most important, WTC 7 was NOT hit by an aircraft or substantial debris from WTC 1 & 2.
ictvvictoria 8 months ago