The Time Is Nigh For The Bankers-Les Visible

No description available.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• les
• visible
• nwo
• zionism
• illuminati
• 2012
• rothschild
• global
• warming
• freemasonary
• occult

[LooksAeterna]

@violetta3333 Now IF you WOULD dig deeper then look here: If the fat ugly assholes wouldn't get sex for exploitation, they wouldn't have any reason to do it.

Most important literature of our times:

warrenfarrell. org/ TheBook/

and also look for "Manipulated Man" by Esther Vilar

Remove spaces and happy reading !

[LooksAeterna]

@violetta3333 Yes, of course. These ugly men getappetitzing sex ONLY because they - directly or more often indirectly PAY for sex, and they can do that ONLY (in excess of their not so ugly competition) because they make unproportional profits which is synonymous with exploitation.

Read the literature I recommended before you send me another thoughtless question mark, please.

[variezn34gm]

2012 = REVELATION 20.12 and justice for them = GENESIS 4.11 in accordance with the REVELATION 4. 2-11 crew. AND BTW ... REVELATION 4.11 and REVELATION 22.21.

[variezn34gm]

I suggest REVELATION 4.11 is going to HANG GENESIS 4.11 and you are being watched.

[LooksAeterna]

To the rest: this troll using the nick "violetta3333" - lacking arguments - has systematically and arbitrarily deleted parts of the arguments. My last reply, for instance contained "Contd." 3 and 4 and contain the clearest debunking analogy to what the troll was trying to purvey. I suggest you move to the "all comments" page and click on the contributions falsely marked as "spam".

[LooksAeterna]

(contd. 2) @violetta3333 ... a millennia old deal between attractive women and ugly, ruthless men, the latest playform of which is financial capitalism.

The state should be there to protect us from such ruthess power, but a sensible person cannot blame the state for what happens because it was undermined, i.e. de facto abolished, by far more primitive forces.

"poticians [sic !] dont set policies, they enable those who set policies."

Bwhaa, as if they had any power to enable anything ! ...

[LooksAeterna]

(contd 1) @violetta3333 "That his existence is a problem never implies that he is not a puppet"

Sure it does because the mere existence of puppets is no problem. Who cares if there is a puppet if they are ignored by everyone ? Part of the problem is the power to present the liars as if they were setting policy. And this power is not with the puppet, it is - obviously - DEEPER. And that happens to be the unholy coalition between sex and power...

[LooksAeterna]

@violetta3333 "This conversation is over"

I wish, and you promised that before - in vain.

"I my god!"

That says a lot about you and fits right in with your previous behavior, especially in light of your rogue pop-pyschology: "What happened in your childhood that made you so emotionally imature."

which is of course just another playform of your insulting and uneducated conduct. Now to the subject matter (contd.)

[violetta3333]

@LooksAeterna ...I think you are pretending to misunderstand me because you've realised that you jumped into conclusion about what i ment to say at the beginning. This conversation is over, obviously you have some personal issues to resolve first, I warned you to stop insulting me but you just can't help yourself. I am guessing one of your parents or both used to call you an idiot/unintelligent/stupid a lot, because you seem to use these words a lot. Take a chill pill, and learn to relax. Bye

[violetta3333]

@LooksAeterna I my god! What happened in your childhood that made you so emotionally imature. For the third time: poticians dont set policies, they enable those who set policies. That his existence is a problem never implies that he is not a puppet - his IS a puppet and it would be better to do without these puppets, becuase we still need bankers, but we don't need this puppets. You keep twisting what i say, and you keep implying things in you head and making up stuff about what I said....