SanDisk SSD Boot Demo at CES2007
Top Comments
All Comments (14)
-
Slight things to notice the one with the HDD clearly has a background which prove the machines are not identical outside of the storage drive difference and implies the machine running a HDD may be stacked with many other non visible things that it is loading. That being said SSD are obviously faster in todays standards
-
bullshit, my 7200 rpm, western digital 640gb sata drive boots up just as fast as the one with the ssd and my old celeron and ide box boots vista faster than the one on the right, they suck at computers.
-
actualy the new ones have a higher mean time before failure, but the rest of what you said still stands.
-
THIS IS HORSE XXXX! I have a Dell D430 with a SSD 5000 and it is so slow I am about to send it back to DELL! It hangs up forever, absolute JUNK.
-
all that aside, ssd's are simply better for running programs. i would never propose using them for storage or a scrap disk, but for running programs theres no contest.
-
SDDs have shorter mean time before failure than HDD, they have limited read/write cycles. Also, they are slower in writing files into it, so it may be fast at bootup but slow during normal runs. If damaged, the contents of an SDD cannot be recovered unlike HD where some sectors are still intact and data can be recovered.
-
You are one stupid person. Do your research before making accusations. Light weight laptops now a days are indeed using 1.8" HD's as opposed to the standard 2.5" laptop HD's. Sure enough that Dell notebook comes from the factory with a 1.8" HD. DUMB ASS
SDD FTW!XD
kingdengamle 4 years ago 3
I'm so into SSD
iamdmc 4 years ago 2