Liberapedia
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (38)
-
@seeheers The point I was making has been lost on you...
-
@meh23p lol
-
@bla34112 yeah... it only makes liberals look bad
-
@StunnedByStupidity hmmm if you go to the acual website it has less citations than wikipedia... seems more like a movement than actual freethinking
-
@obamasensation say anything against evolution on wikipedia... it gets censored
-
It's not up anymore. Big surprise.
-
...A red star? Liberalism? Roflolz.
-
Liberalpedia has been going for centuries its called 'the scientific method'.
-
@obamasensation Wikipedia is fairly good in some areas, but it definitely leaves out crucial information on some topics. Censorship is a reality and done against both conservative and liberal sides at different times as well as against others. Just compare homosexuality on wikipedia vs. conservapedia re: health and whether it's natural/people are born with it (and parenting, mental issues, etc.). Which side has more science supporting it?
-
would you counter bullshit with more bullshit?
Speaking as liberal minded person, lemme say that this is getting silly. Why on earth would you want to play their game? There was never anything wrong with Wikipedia- it was never trying to be biased. I'm failing to see how countering an inaccurate right wing wiki with an inaccurate left wing one improves the situation for anyone.
obamasensation 2 years ago 15
yeah babie!
ubcphysicsyangbo 3 years ago 6