3-Way Debate (Full Debate) Part 9
Top Comments
All Comments (9)
-
I admit, Kent Hovind is really good at playing to the crowds. However, he has no testable theory(ies) to support his Young Earth Creationism. So, while he provides great entertainment for Fundamentalist Christians, he would fail to convince a crowd of PhD scientists (or people that have a general understanding of science). I have yet to see him give an argument in favor of Young Earth Creationism. All I am hearing is, "I think evolution is stupid because..."
-
Kent's goal is to make a joke of evolution and attempt to make his argument through humor and suggesting that scientists are actually purposely coming up with lies and excuses when exactly the opposite is the case (i.e. creationists).
-
I thought this was a debate, not Kent's take on evolution. Wheres the evidence for creationism?
Of course his argument are all just "evolution got it wrong" since there is absolutely no evidence for creationism.
You cant just say someones position is crap and you win by default. Thats not how it work.
-
Ask him when the textbook is printed... lol!
-
K. H. just keeps using the same arguments over and over again!! Even the same jokes!! I just saw a much older video where most of the "issues" about evolution were explained to him, however here he is again using the very same memorized speech, as if he had never heard any answer for these ever!! WTH??!!!!
-
He replies on his delivery. He is actually quite funny.
Until I remember that people actually take him seriously
-
Maybe Hovind should look up the word "need"
-
If you can live with out your appendix you do NOT NEED it..... Moron
Kent sucks... he's making up all these stories just for fanfare. The people are easily amused.... ridiculous...
ricpride 2 years ago 4