2010 4.6 F150 4x4 vs 2010 5.7 Tundra 2wd (proof toyota makes crap)

this is a bone stock 4x4 4.6L F150 keeping up with a modded 5.7L tundra. tundra has a air raid intake and diablo predator tuner.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• F150
• vs
• Tundra
• truck
• race
• racing

[HawaiianGuy24]

If any of you actually knew how automobiles operate, then you would know that two different vehicle makes have totally different suspension setups. It's not all about horsepower, there are other factors involved that make each one operate completely different from one another. An air intake doesn't make enough horsepower to where it makes a difference that you can feel. Oh, and the Ford still lost that race!

[stuntrider15]

@HawaiianGuy24 i put an intake on my F150 alone and it picked up 22rwhp. and yes you can feel it. also the tundra was tuned for that intake and had gears. read the description

[HawaiianGuy24]

@stuntrider15 Wow, you must be retarded, I did read the description and it says the Tundra had an air intake and a tuner. Nowhere did it say it has gears!!! I am a mechanic and if all you installed was an intake, then no you didn't pick up 22rwhp. You probably just read the little brochure that comes with it. I'll believe you when you show dyno proof.

[stuntrider15]

@HawaiianGuy24 congrats to you, and no there was no brochure dipshit, its a intake the shop i work at makes, and we have before and after dyno results proven on the dyno we picked up 22rwhp with just the cold air intake.

[2003VORTEC]

Next time let the guy in the tundra know your trying to race him because you would get wasted I have raced a 4.6 f150 with my 2005 focus and he didn't have a chance

[stuntrider15]

@2003VORTEC im sure you have pal

[135yota]

@stuntrider15 that tundra was stock and that is just dumb to say that the tundra cant hang, with the ecoboost...oh my gosh can't stop laughing. Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha­hahahahahaha you suck.

[135yota]

@stuntrider15. check out the 0-60 specs for the ecoboost and the 5.7 Tundra, then come back and say the ecoboost would make ricecakes out of the tundra. Bull. You obviously don't have a clue how to read let alone race. I can handle the 3.5 f150 & 5.0 in My 2007 3.5 RAV4 without any change in either of us taking the lead or falling behind. With that said, you will NOT waste a 5.7 Tundra in any of these F150 trucks, stock...hats off to the performance of the fords!! but also to the 5.7 Tundra too.

[SirOskerLowkeyy]

@HawaiianGuy24 hahaa OWNED!!

[luke19powerstroke]

haha u had no chance dude and hes obviously not at full throttle ive have both trucks and a 4.6 is weak very weak tundra alot faster i mean alot faster

[christheblack1]

@Loza13x....So you're saying twin-turbos are a new technology? I didn't know that, I thought Toyota had used twin sequential turbos on a certain 2.5L & 3.0L inline-6 Engine, and even Mitsubishi and Nissan have made TT engines before.

[Loza13x]

Ecoboost was designed to deliver power and torque output equivalent to a typical "6.0 L" or larger displacement V8 while achieving at least 15% better fuel. It's pretty much Ford's new v8 without the need of using 2 more cylinders. They will also be using eco boost engines on there sports cars. I personally give them props for achieving this new technology.

[BklynJayL]

I love Ford's 281 V8s! Very good, durable engines!