Fox News Sunday - May 15, 2011 Anchor Chris Wallace comes armed and prepared and obliterates Ron Paul over his ignorance about the Constitution and associated issues such as taxation, social security and medicare.
One of the few times a Fox News anchor actually does a good fact-based interview.
I wouldn't say Wallace blew anyone away... I think Ron Paul has a different interpretation (and in my opinion, a more accurate interpretation) of what the constitution's intent is. I don't think he is ignorant for having those views. I think we are labeling him under the same terms as someone who opposed legalized slavery in America. Do we agree with the Dred Scott Case of 1857? No! Should we accept that a 1937 court ruled in favor of social security? Absolutely not! Keep fighting Ron Paul!
Voter fraud once more.
theman4130 1 hour ago
@tr2006x , I'll bet you voted for Obama
SPAGHETTIMONSTER1 8 hours ago
@jrooksable Do you not listen with your ears?
blah1311 10 hours ago
@theman4130 I love your amazing predictions. Or is it going according to the fad.
blah1311 10 hours ago
MoRon Paul 2012!
Nice interview, an 18th century ignorant farmer facing Chris Wallace.
tr2006x 15 hours ago
I'm confused as to what to do, I like the video but not the title, do I like or dislike?
jasta4 1 day ago
All I saw was Ron Paul owning Wallace lmao nice try manipulating the title though. Do you by any chance work for the mainstream media, precious?
Kushologyy 3 days ago
@gijosh2687 i agree but that doesn't really apply, i have no idea what you're talking about.
WhiskeyTango12 4 days ago
@WhiskeyTango12 If you are ignorant of the past, you are likely to repeat the same mistakes.
gijosh2687 4 days ago
I wouldn't say Wallace blew anyone away... I think Ron Paul has a different interpretation (and in my opinion, a more accurate interpretation) of what the constitution's intent is. I don't think he is ignorant for having those views. I think we are labeling him under the same terms as someone who opposed legalized slavery in America. Do we agree with the Dred Scott Case of 1857? No! Should we accept that a 1937 court ruled in favor of social security? Absolutely not! Keep fighting Ron Paul!
S0nny1984 1 week ago