Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

American Airlines Flight 77 - Flight path simulation.

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
11,539
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 20, 2007

This simulation suggests that it is relatively easy to collide a jetliner with a specific landmark.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 10 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (v01i0)

  • dude.. its was 9/11... the 11th of september :P and hani hanjour was a hijacker

  • @Bakuneon I know. I just sometimes get confused because here in Scandinavia our syntax marking the dates is bit different... I am all too lazy to edit the video. So I let the misinformation reflect my stupidity :)

see all

All Comments (159)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Merlin5x5 O.k. End of conversation from me. I do not agree.

  • @asicit2b

    Actually, the History Channel was telling the story of Stanley Praimnath,

    NOT the WTC 2 attack plane. It's VERY accurate when it comes to Stanley.

    MUCH More accurate than YOU, for instance.

    AND, you are IGNORING My careful analysis completely, as usual.

    At +2 Seconds, the plane was at least 1500 FEET away, and at least

    2 seconds of descent LOWER than 400 feet. At the 3.7 degree slope the

    757, that would place him about 100 FEET high over the pentagon lawn.

    Everything matches.

  • @Merlin5x5 So have we determined that the data shows the plane about 400 ft. high 1.5 seconds or 1,100

    feet away is this correct ?

  • @Merlin5x5 The History Channel has proven to be wrong. Do you have anything better ?

  • @asicit2b

    I referred you to the History channel special because they have the NTSB video.

    You were supposed to be looking at the control inputs the NTSB videos show.

    ANYONE who looks at the actual control movements knows that this attack

    was a walk in the park. Contrary to conspiracist BULLSHIT, there were NO

    fast or tight turns, no extreme control yoke movement, no extreme throttle

    excursions. It's all right there in the NTSB video.

    Isn't that EXACTLY what you asked?

  • @Merlin5x5 I asked for you to show IF a "hijacker" could fly like this using the GIVEN flight data You referred me to

    a worthless video that proves nothing. Then I asked if you had anything better. You referred me to the History Channel

    The History channel could not even keep stanlys "story" straight, So I declined. DO you have anything better ?

  • @asicit2b

    I just got done telling you the History Channel animation was wrong.

    Both in the placement of the plane, and Stanley Praimnath. ODDLY,

    they got sort of mirror image, with the plane banking LEVEL in the video.

    The Plane should have been on Stanley's LEFT, but it's NOT very

    dramatic that way, is it?

    The NIST/NTSB animation of the WTC 1 impact was correct.

    The NIST/NTSB animation of the WTC 2 impact was correct.

    The NIST/NTSB animation of the Pentagon Impact was correct.

  • @Merlin5x5 You say stanly was on the left side of the building which is the west side, correct ? Lets stay with the History channel documentery Stanly is facing the windows looking out south ,correct ?

    which side is the nose of the plane shown coming into the building, on his right or left ? His right being the west

    his left being east. so is it stanlys Right or left that the nose is shown ?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more