Woman calls 911 and ends up shooting intruder

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
10,735
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 7, 2009

From http://www.kwtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=11620319
Donna Jackson waits on the phone for help while a man smashes through her door.
She has no choice but to use lethal force, after waiting for nearly 20 minutes for police to arrive.
The poor woman can be heard praying while on the phone with the 911 dispatcher.
Fortunately for Ms Jackson, she is able to defend her life - thanks to the 2nd amendment.

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (fargley001)

  • Dont feed the troll ↓

Top Comments

  • GUN CONTROL: The theory that a woman lying dead in an alley, raped and strangled by her own panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal wound!

    My heart goes out to this woman, who clearly, regretted what she had to do, but I'm glad she had the courage to protect herself.

  • Somebody should give her an award.

see all

All Comments (63)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • She's a murderer and will rot in hell. She didn't want to kill him? LOL! I guess this bitch has never heard of firing a warning shot. Piece of shit cunt!

  • @ricemachinegun the other one that was on tv the dispatcher said "we cant advise you "when the caller asked if she could shoot intruders thats typical in a case where a cop raped a girl the police said "are you a doctor" "we dont know where he is we think he moved to south america"

  • 2:10 "Police are investigating whethere there should be any charges in this shooting"

    Unbelievable. The justice system is bull shit. She deserves an medal. She eliminated one homocidal maniac off the face of the earth to protect herself and didn't waste taxpayers money to bring that maniac to court to feed him in jail.

  • @fakiir Are their no adults that are easily seduced by smooth talking perverts? I had an uncle that got taken for everything he had by a women, because of how seductive she was. A female cousin of mine got seduced into giving her virginity for a dude that had no plans on staying with her. Adults can be just as ignorant--sometimes more ignorant- than kids

    A Country faces punishment by a series of Countries if it pursuits a particular action...that makes it illegal. It's in writing at the UN, too

  • @Seedofwinter those are too totally different things. its illegal for adults to have sex with a minor because kids are stupid and easily seduced/taken advantage of by smooth talking perverts. the law is there to protect them until they know enough to make an informed decision.

    and its not even illegal for a country to have nuclear weapons. don't know where you got that from, lol. the US simply threatens military action against nations such as Iran that are bat-shit crazy and would use a nuke.

  • @Seedofwinter yes, and alcoholics are able to purchase cars. whats the difference?

    if some people had been armed and trained in personal defense at VA-tech, perhaps so many people would not have had to die. or it may have made no difference at all. too late to tell now.

    you should read more into the issue. the fact stands that violent crime is reduced in areas which allow open or concealed carry of firearms. its a simple risk vs reward assessment for the criminal.

  • @fargley001 Once again, the purpose on banning them is to stop psychos from committing mass murder, more than the impoverished street criminal--which wouldn't be able to afford the more exotic weapons and will use a handgun.

    In sense of authority, the government will always be more powerful. In the democratic sense, in which we could vote them out, you're correct.

    It is true. It's evidenced in the crime statistics.

    They have hand guns, for self defense. SWAT has automatics weapons- to kill

  • @fargley001 You just balked at me for not agreeing on facts; don't do what you just accused me of

    Seung bought those firearms LEGALLY, it doesn't matter what zone he's in.

    The Constitution also says that a black man is worth 3/5ths a man, thus granting slavery as a Constitutional right. I'm sure me and you could see that flaw. If it has one flaw, it could have more

    Well, I say assault rifles and ak47's aren't practical for self defense. They aren't guns made for defense, but rather to assault

  • @Seedofwinter

    1) How many, per capita, unjustifiable homicides are committed with civilian owned full autos? Note there are 307 Million people in the US. What improvement would you expect by banning them?

    2) I disagree on this principle. The people are to be more powerful than the government - the government is to serve the governed.

    3) This is not true. Our own government has sold thousands of full autos (grenades and rpg's) to criminals

    4) Why do police have guns if they are so dangerous?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more