Democracy Sucks & Blows

And not in a good way!


SUBSCRIBE to my friend Ray, he's got some groovy stuff!

http://www.youtube.com/user/londonpenda

Tactics playlist

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=F493F5F0DC1873FB

Anti-Statism

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=138DA7B85780076B

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• democracy
• tyranny
• of
• the
• majority
• dictatorship
• proletariat
• direct
• initiatives
• America
• voting
• prop
• proposition
• fails
• sucks
• switzerland
• yt:quality=high

[andyobby]

democracy is better than anarchy though

[InTheEndIWasRight]

@andyobby not really, unless your fine with coercion on a mass scale

[MachineLegion]

You mean "people don't always get what they want"? Because that line of thinking applies to materialistic things and is shoved down the throats of children by their parents, but we're not talking about getting some T.V. or toy, we're talking about freedom. So if you're going to talk about "democracy is good, you don't always get what you want, get over it, blah blah blah" then you're in the wrong place bro.

[yvettefoto]

All you have to do is discover a new fact or clearly superior paradigm to find out what happens if you're right and everybody else is wrong. You'll find out 99.99% of people can be wrong about something and have no idea at all! Then you're fucked!

[Ringvireot]

@DoctorCapitalist: thanks for sharing that info with me. I will prove that theory quite useful in a later date.

[DoctorCapitalist]

@Ringvireot That's mostly just my conjecture though. There'd also be nothing to stop people from entering communities with other social ideas. You'd just enter contracts when you buy housing off of socialist homesteaders saying you'll agree to do things socialist or whatever.

[DoctorCapitalist]

@Ringvireot I believe that respect for other people's property comes pretty naturally since noone wants people to fuck with their own property (that is, do things with a person's property against their desires). Respect for other people's property comes into place quite quickly so there's cooperation between individuals. It reduces the most amount of conflict (although there would be some criminals of course).

[DoctorCapitalist]

@Ringvireot Polycentric law came before the state. Judges used were people who resolved disputes between multiple parties. They were mutually agreed upon judgers for those having a dispute. They would enter an agreement to abide by the judge's ruling. These judges typically had a reputation for being objective, trustworthy and unbiased.

This is common law, and not law from the top down. Although I do see your point on the possibility of overlapping legal systems.

[Ringvireot]

@DoctorCapitalist: it might be very useful to people who don't believe in either democracy and/or republic parties, but it's forbidden to talk about overlapping legal systems to alternate the economic system in that legal structure.

[DoctorCapitalist]

@andyobby If you're referring to socialist anarchy then yes. Polycentric law (or anarcho-capitalism) would be fucking awesome.

[DanielShaysRebellion]

@Jasonthegaiface do you mean George Bush and compassionate conservatives??? or the current Obama Administration

[DanielShaysRebellion]

@jimberkt in the us wa get to have our cake and eat it too.... so we have a representative democracy under a republican governance which has evolved/slyly subverted into a legislative democracy which pays lip service to the constitutional restrictions they are supposed to adhere to but have legislated into volunteerism under the 14th amendment et.al..........

WTF happened?

private contracts in the form of Fed reserve notes........

remember contracts are not subject to constitutional restrictions