World Trade Center Reconstruction Site Progress Insulting Desperate Onlookers
Uploader Comments (Cryptome1)
All Comments (13)
-
@jacktls26 - What part of my prior comment confuses you?
1) my thanks to New York Architect Cryptome1 for his post
2) my suspicion that the WTC towers were poorly designed and structurally weak (like the 59-story Citicorp in NY that authorities feared would collapse duke•edu/~hpgavin/ce131/citico
rp1.htm) -
@MediaBlitzDIR what ???????
-
@smokenfly514 estimated to be done in 2013
-
barriers??? there's a 70 foot drop straight down to bed rock with out those barriers those contractors would a shit load of liability to deal with
-
I just wanted to know by when the towers should be rebuilt, and how they demolished what remained of the original ones. Can anyone help? Thanks
-
No airliner crashed in Shanksville??
-
Thank you for sharing your professional opinion as an architect. I've always suspected the real conspiracy concerning the WTC was preventing the public from learning the towers were poorly designed and structurally weak. Which begs the question "How many other U.S. sky-scrapers are similarly flawed?"
-
google: "Israel did 9/11"
-
google "israel did 9/11"
Nothing I've seen supports the arguments outlined, but I'm a skeptic of assertions are not backed up with thorough information. Anything withheld that the public must take on faith, discredits any account. I know that conspiracy theories are appealing, which is why spies, scholars and faith-peddlers are so honored for outlandish bogosities.
Cryptome1 2 years ago
Part 7
There are barriers now to such open participation in developing public knowledge and confidence in what happened at WTC, crassly represented by the street barriers at the site emblazoned with sacchrine renderings, and totally misrepresented by the inexorable reconstruction of the same old banal and bloated architecture by the same old dark-sided crew.
Thank your for not snoring or snorting.
Cryptome1 2 years ago
Part 6
A beneficial discussion can be had about WTC but it must be informed by more than speculation and suspicion, that is, experienced professionals and officials who have taken part in WTC investigations and are now keeping quiet must participate openly not secretly. And they will not tell what they know so long as they are threatened with "professional suicide."
Continues
Cryptome1 2 years ago
Part 5
Bear in mind that most in the architectural, engineering, construction and finance industries favor the method of excluding the public. When disasters occur as a result of this method, the response is to seal court records, settle with victims, dampen investigations by compliant commissions, and swear professionals to confidentiality -- to speak out is to "commit professional suicide" so say the wisened
Continues.
Cryptome1 2 years ago
Part 4
A consequence of this public exclusion is the rise in suspicion and paranoia about what caused the WTC collapse. NIST's voluminous study omitted crucial information about the cause of the collapse, with the expectation that stonewalling the public will work as it has in the past, under the claim that the public must not be alarmed in these terrorism-troubled times.
Continues
Cryptome1 2 years ago
Part 3
Instead, compliance with these standards was bypassed through special powers granted to the Port Authority by the States of New York and New Jersey.
The Port Authority is not alone among the nation's hundreds of special authorities established to bypass local building codes and public review. The reconstruction of WTC is utilizing the same public-interest bypassing mechanisms, which is why developers are happy to cut deals with officials who fear public review.
Continues
Cryptome1 2 years ago