Proof of Fakery (see notes)

Someone uploaded a supposedly new video of WTC7 taken with home video that has flashes and sounds of explosions. The video is clearly and provably fake.

1. It is reversed frame-by-frame. It could not be the other side of the building because that side was shrouded in smoke. Also (as others have noted) the other side doesn't look like this). I have here decomposed the video into jpg images, batch reversed them, and recomposed them into a video. How would home video footage become flipped in the first place? There may be some software that does this, but I don't know what it is. Why would any legitimate video be processed this way?
2. The pattern of window breakage does not match other videos. One pattern of broken windows under the east penthouse is clearly duplicated a few floors lower like a crude Photoshop copy. This is not seen in other videos.
3. In documented footage the east penthouse completely disappears before the west penthouse starts to disappear. In this video the west penthouse is completely gone while a corner of the east penthouse is still visible.
4. After the east penthouse falls, with the accompanying window breakage under it, there is a significant delay before the west penthouse falls. The windows under the west penthouse do not break until after collapse begins, yet in this video the window breakage, with flashes, occurs while a corner of the east penthouse is still visible.
5. And so forth. Someone put way too much effort into faking this video in comparison with how crude it is.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• fake
• wtc7
• video

[WTFaboutWTC7]

Does it matter? It went in to freefall...

[DavidSChandler]

@WTFaboutWTC7 Yes it matters. Truth matters. Credibility matters. Somebody jerking us around and wasting our time matters.  Whoever put this up is working against the Truth movement.

[DavidSChandler]

@tuzmor I was asked by someone in the movement, who thought it might be real, to check it out. That's what I did. Putting out fires goes with the territory.

[ctcole77]

@DavidSChandler

Dr. James Millette of MVA Scientific Consultants

WTC Dust Study

2/28/2012

"The red/gray chips found in the WTC dust at four sites in New York City are consistent with a carbon steel coated with an epoxy resin that contains primarily iron oxide and kaolin clay pigments."

"There is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles of any size in the red/gray chips, therefore the red layer of the red/gray chips is not thermite or nanothermite."

911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!

[loosechangeexposed]

controlled demolition of wtc 7 has been debunked

/watch?v=ud87BgQmzio

controlled demolition of the twin towers has been debunked

/watch?v=ywHW5UewN8A

proof of a cover up by a truther has been exposed

/watch?v=E1FTx-PhW_s

proof that truthers make things look the way they need

/watch?v=w-XD7P7m0Ug

[Jimbofx911]

An observation made by a youtuber named MrKoenig1985. In a video of the beginning of the south tower " collapse " He observed what may be core columns, 3 of them still attached by the horizontal braces being ejected from the South Tower? Would be nice to hear some expert opinion on this.This is the video in question: watch?v=0fbk3SoKdIEBTW great hearings in Toronto.

[Jimbofx911]

I wonder if a study of the ruins after the Demolition of WTC 1 and 2 before any "steel workers torches" were on site could help to further prove the use of cutter charges and explosive matter in the destruction of these two towers. I see massive cores cut a 90 degrees all over prior cutting torches being used. Could mapping the location of material be worthwhile as well as identifying cuts made by cutter charges? The partial stairwell, multiple 90 degree cuts visible. Just wondering. Hope so.

[Jimbofx911]

I find the logic and common sense science is key to bring the criminal ring behind WTC bombings to justice. Good science demands integrity and we trusted NIST to provide that.It was an obvious mistake to do so I trust in NIST for accurate internet time, not accurate information about WTC 911 events. They have proved themselves terribly bad liars at the very least. A computer and shareware, a teacher and facts put NIST to shame.

[Hellenbach13]

Explosions didnt bring those buildings down, they didnt 'pan cake' they were pulverized in mid air. There wasnt enough wreckage on the ground. There is a different technology going on here. Also 6.5 buildings went down that day, not just 3.

[winston2015]

@parallelsdumaurier no question that wtc 1 2 & 7 were brought down with explosives. Even barring the mountain of evidence that proves this beyond all reasonable doubt,,, its clear as day in the videos that they were demolished with preplanted explosives.

Ive studied this, wishing it to be wrong. but the facts speak for themselves.. louder than any personal incredulity

[Bernadotte01]

NIST released a lot of footage last year...footage that includes a visible thermite reaction, an explosive ejection of a significant mass at an "extrememly high velocity", and the orange flash of cutter charges detonating - e.g. on a perimeter column:

v=y4yGCO_1cE4

on a corner column:

v=P7nzIRkKeAI

from NIST cumulus

[Ghiani16]

@WTFaboutWTC7 yeah man fuck those fake shit video's ur right the thing came down with the speed of light... fuckin bombs

[NotableJInx2]

two*