Prosecutor vs. Ron Paul YouTuber (FIJA, marijuana)

Sponsor: http://NHLiberty.org - Free Stater tangles with D.A. while trying to hand out Fully Informed Jury pamphlets. Despite the inherent threat of having a government lawyer interacting with you...at least the guy was willing to have some dialogue. This happened in Tarrant County Texas, which I assume means Fort Worth. But the cameraman is one of the thousands who are pledged to move to New Hampshire.

Video from: http://www.youtube.com/justino81
Music by: http://MarkAndDenise.com

Featured in this story...Free Staters...people who pledge they'll move to New Hampshire to struggle for more liberty:
http://FreeStateProject.org

You can buy an ad on the Ridley Report; here's how:
http://RidleyReport.com/Ad

Campaign for liberty ron paul fully informed jury association. tape Youtuber citizen media indie reporters journalists. ridleyreport fija. New hampshire fija.org Michael Phelps, ted kennedy
free state project tarrant county prosecutor da d.a. district attorney kevin rosseau freedom of the press dave ridley report fort worth texas dallas caught on camera dfw court jail victimless crime laws. Judge juror marijuana pot but cannabis.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• ron
• paul
• michael
• phelps
• pot
• marijuana
• free
• state
• project
• fort
• worth
• texas
• jury
• victimless
• crime
• laws
• jail
• caught
• tape

[RidleyReport]

the prosecutor was in texas, i do not know that he was innacurate in his statements.

[p00lman]

"And what if the law is immoral?"

What an idiot. If a law is immoral, you think one prosecuter can do anything about it? Do you think one prosecuter who takes an oath to uphold that law intends to do anything about it?

Free staters just love harrassing people, but they harrass those who have no power to change anything. It's pathetic and it's obnoxious. They're like kids who tell the teacher they don't want to do their homework.

[RidleyReport]

if a prosecutor resigned in protest of unjust laws, and announced it to the public, would that change things slightly or not?

[wait887]

well then. Hopefully your not in NH so that I won't have to interact with you.

[MagnusIan]

p00lman, you troll, go eat a bag of dicks.

[nalejbank]

@RidleyReport Honestly and sadly... probably not. They would have to do that AND join the FIJA efforts and lead the charge at education and activism. Now, that would work.

[silentthriller]

@Chunkylover712 Ok dude.

[Chunkylover712]

@starsstanley99

This is absolutely incorrect. It is statements like this that welcome tyranny with open arms. The courts ARE the place to object to the law. The Judicial branch is a necessary check to the powers of the legislature. But jackass the cameraman here doesn't understand what he is being told, the jury decides FACT, and the judge decides LAW.

“The court is to protect against encroachment of constitutionally secured liberty.”

Boyd v. U.S

[Chunkylover712]

@silentthriller

Law is not opinion. This is a common misconception amongst the ignorant masses. Law is something that is discovered, not invented. Rights are recognized, not created. Unconstitutional acts and statutes are not law, and are null and void of law from their date of inception. This means that any act or statute that diminishes liberty, life, or happiness arbitrarily is unconstitutional, and therefor not law. The guy with the camera is a moron.

[MrAlpruitt]

I like the fact that this guy took the time to explain his position. The gentleman who made this recording however, could have won that debate, by arguing solely on the grounds that actually he is acting within the law. If you do some research on Jury nullification you will find it has roots in the UK and colonial America.

Of course, he is a prosecutor, that doesn't help him. :) Typically defense lawyers are sympathetic to jury nullification.

[tronclay]

i usually agree with most people who stand up for their rights etc, but people that go out desiring confrontation are idiots, and on the other hand guys like the cameraman in this video are just so hyped up and blinded by their own cause they cant even slow down long enough to LISTEN and THINK like a logical human being, they can only spew out the latest thing they read on some DefendYourRights forum

[WONDOCTORJ]

smoking reefer = no corpus delecti = case dismissed

[libertarianjury]

This prosecutor fuck is an abject idiot, but the defender of liberty appears to not know his history, or how to argue logically. Too bad. I would never have said "Thank you sir." I would have said "Your argument is the argument of the slavemasters and tyrants, and you are a petty tyrant for a living. It's no wonder you're blind to both history and logic." Once you get them into the area of history, their remaining argument disappears: why were juries perverted with "vior dire"?

[libertarianjury]

This prosecutor should be ridiculed severely, and insulted for being an un-American dog.