Top Ten Infantry Fighting Vehicles Nr. 5
Top Comments
All Comments (128)
-
epic picture at 2:05
-
This thing is nothing more than APC, where is IFV, stupid Discovery nowadays?
-
Shermans fared well against T-34's in Korea.
The T-34 is massively overrated by discovery channel and the likes
-
@Tyco200 hey, its you, the guy who thinks a sherman can face off against a t34.
the sherman was not a good tank, it was a many used one, and i was very addaptible, but not good.
why? bad gun, bad armor, petrol engine etc.
-
@OlderG0ds Yes both this and the tiger had impact because since WWII was lost, it barely saw service anywhere else
-
@matt6517 Thanks for the response btw.
-
@matt6517 Oh lmao! yeh that comment was old. And yeh you're right; alot of pointless arguments here.
-
@alexmoskov Maybe it's a lucky mascot? Which is probably a good idea in a war.
By the way, it looked like your comment wasn't going to get aswered for a moment there, as the page is so full of patriotic retards bickering about whose country is best. I wish they would just comment on the video, and stage their debates/arguments on a forum somewhere else.
-
They were even given howitzers. 251 = Successful, monster! Fast, can keep up with the Blitzkrieg campaign, etc.
-
Russia built some of the worst early tanks. Even their later designs... America's Sherman deserves way more respect. Sorry, but... My god. If you learned the Sherman's true history, you'd be shocked at how stupid even Americans are. Their tanks were supreme. As for the 251, beautiful. Slopped armored carriers with outstanding track-system.
That's fallacious, and frankly quite stupid logic you presented there.
So Tiger had no impact because Germany lost the war too?
Why don't you just look at the vehicle, what it did, and not what country they're made in or whether the war was finally won or not.
OlderG0ds 2 years ago 13
for me this was THE apc of WW2
pele220 1 year ago 10