"Harm reduction" is a divisive term among treatment professionals working with drug users -- it irritates many who believe that abstinence is the only legitimate goal of drug related interventions. Even if harm reduction programs, such as opiate substitution treatment or needle exchange gained great popularity and acceptance in the past decade in most countries of the world, there is still much confusion and debate about the theoretical and philosophical aspects. We interviewed several people in Vienna at the Global NGO Forum this June to learn about their opinions on harm reduction. We identified the following definitions of and approaches to harm reduction among the participants:
1) There are still opponents of harm reduction who consequently reject harm reduction and label it as "harm promotion", or the "Trojan horse of legalizers". The opinion is hold mostly by the advocates of the War on Drugs in the U.S., where official documents never use the term.
2) Some people (like Antonio Maria Costa, head of UNODC) try to define every anti-drug activities as harm reduction, including the eradication of drug crops in Afghanistan and interdiction efforts of the police. They argue that all these interventions aim to reduce the harms caused by illicit substance abuse .
3) Others say harm reduction should not be a goal in itself but only a first step in the long way to abstinence. According to this approach harm reduction is only a subsidiary tool in the fight against drugs, with limited relevance, subordinated to abstinence-based treatment and primary prevention.
4) Proponents of harm reduction define it as a theoretical and practical framework to deal with drug users, based on the respect of scientific evidence and human rights, pragmatism and compassion. They argue that abstinence should not be always an absolute goal but every interventions are legitimate that improve the health and well-being of people who use drugs.
Fuck you Antonio Maria Costa. Do you know what really is wrong? Wrong is you mandating all countries in the world to use violence against me because you do not agree with my lifestyle. Does it no compute in the heads of these UN people what kind of provocation against me and millions of other people they cause when they require every government's police to violently confiscate property because of some hobby that people enjoy? You made my own government my enemy, should I thank you for helping me
rKos 1 year ago 4
"Abstinence only" is just as useless in the addiction model as it is as an answer to teen pregnancy!
LeshaAnn 9 months ago