Climate Gate Investigation and Debate Pt1 of 2
Top Comments
All Comments (8)
-
I'm just thinking of all the inquiries and reports concerning WMDs in Iraq.
-
Oh - nice come back MORON.
-
-
@aerobique "a semi-professional lie-spammer "
Once again WRONG - I wish I was being paid but the fact is I'm not.
However if anyone out there whats to pay me for informing people of the facts and pointing out liars and fraudsters PLEASE contact me.
Monkton simply points out the all the lies, misinformation, disinformation, hypocrisy and stupidity using data and facts.
Funny how proponents of this LIE like Al Gore etc.. run from him like the plague - what are they so scared of?
-
your name says it all, a semi-professional lie-spammer everything you say is clearly wrong or misleading- but thats your "job". Indeed, the most respected/reliable science is publicly funded. Yes, "the evil government" coordinates that. Your PR-clowns are funded by private corporations, front groups and right-wing think tanks. lol game over
Dude, noone with an iq above room temperature take people serious that rely on 'lord' monckton & such obvious ideologues and oil-trolls.
-
@aerobique -"more than 95% of climate scientists"
WRONG.
I sure you meant that 95% of the statements made by government funded institutes agree.
However there are far less climate scientists that agree and even less physicists.
By the way Dr Richard Lindzen is without doubt the worlds top climatologist by far - he doesn't support AGW and neither does he's significant research.
Also the 2 greatest living physicists in the world today don't support AGW.along with 40,000 other scientists.
-
@aerobique Yeah those skeptics have marketing teams and media-drillers behind them, funded by multi national oil company's.
"Journalists are taught to present both sides of the story. However, this can lead the public into thinking that both sides of the story are equal. If more than 95% of climate scientists state that humans are the cause of global warming but then the few skeptics and deniers are given the same air time and print space as this majority, how can the public be blamed for thinking there is still debate...?"
t iny url . c om / oiltrolls
aerobique 1 year ago 5