Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

The Root of All Evil - The God Delusion (Part 4-5)

The Root of All Evil - The God Delusion (Part 4-5)  
 
Customize

More From: nethius

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
287 ratings
Sign in to rate
42,034 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (231)   Options

Loading...
acvossius (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Well you can give me the references, i have acces to several universities` libraries, both physical and online. Most peerreviewed magazines etc. are freely available.
chrislcolwell (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
sent you some articles, and please send me some i want to read them
Ivence (1 week ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Please don't cite Behe's work. There are not demonstrated "irreducibly complex" structures, there are well accepted accounts on how these things could have evolved.
chrislcolwell (1 week ago) Show Hide
 -2
Marked as spam
well then don't cite anything on the side of Evolution. every evolutionist has built there case on the theory that darwin proposed.. a disproven theory.. and yes there are demonstrated "irreducibly complex" structures we have not the slightest chance of a chemical evolutionary origin for even the simpilist of cells. there is no chance that darwiism can possibly survive the information of biology in the 21'st century it's a dated fruitless endevour with no outcome in the end.
acvossius (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
He did, and bembski too, and its not lab work or experiments, just popular books.

Always claiming evolution has been disproven without some actual scientific research data to back it up.

Having read "a brief history of time", can i now make educated statements about astrophysics?

I have population biologists, chemical engineers and a particle physicist (all phd`s) among my friends. Give us something they could test themselfs in a lab?
acvossius (5 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
So no actual scientific research papers? to send, or are you still looking?
chrislcolwell (1 week ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
evolution science is built on the back of darwins theory we all know that, well darwin said this..."If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down." we now know the cell to be way more complex then he originally thought, and evolution is built on what darwin proposed, if darwin was alive today he would see the evidence and lay down his theory but you cant
AcanLord (3 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
are you attempting to declare the irreducible complexity of the cell?

I certainly hope not.
chrislcolwell (2 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
uhhh, yes i am and i have no idea why im telling you this when you know that i am. how abought telling me something besides making dumb statements.
AcanLord (2 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
That`s a shame.

You are not familiar with the highly probable process known as Prebiotic chemical evolution, where by nonliving structures tend towards a state of homeostasis?

It is a concept given wide spread attention in the study of abiogenesis.
And much of what we have seen in modern Biochem labs owe this explanation greater credence, Namely the Observed and wholly unguided process of the formation of the protocells required constituents.

Irreducible complexity fail.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.