Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
This video has been removed from your Favorites. (Undo)
Like to Favorite videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Well you can give me the references, i have acces to several universities` libraries, both physical and online. Most peerreviewed magazines etc. are freely available.
Please don't cite Behe's work. There are not demonstrated "irreducibly complex" structures, there are well accepted accounts on how these things could have evolved.
well then don't cite anything on the side of Evolution. every evolutionist has built there case on the theory that darwin proposed.. a disproven theory.. and yes there are demonstrated "irreducibly complex" structures we have not the slightest chance of a chemical evolutionary origin for even the simpilist of cells. there is no chance that darwiism can possibly survive the information of biology in the 21'st century it's a dated fruitless endevour with no outcome in the end.
He did, and bembski too, and its not lab work or experiments, just popular books.
Always claiming evolution has been disproven without some actual scientific research data to back it up.
Having read "a brief history of time", can i now make educated statements about astrophysics?
I have population biologists, chemical engineers and a particle physicist (all phd`s) among my friends. Give us something they could test themselfs in a lab?
evolution science is built on the back of darwins theory we all know that, well darwin said this..."If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down." we now know the cell to be way more complex then he originally thought, and evolution is built on what darwin proposed, if darwin was alive today he would see the evidence and lay down his theory but you cant
You are not familiar with the highly probable process known as Prebiotic chemical evolution, where by nonliving structures tend towards a state of homeostasis?
It is a concept given wide spread attention in the study of abiogenesis. And much of what we have seen in modern Biochem labs owe this explanation greater credence, Namely the Observed and wholly unguided process of the formation of the protocells required constituents.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Always claiming evolution has been disproven without some actual scientific research data to back it up.
Having read "a brief history of time", can i now make educated statements about astrophysics?
I have population biologists, chemical engineers and a particle physicist (all phd`s) among my friends. Give us something they could test themselfs in a lab?
I certainly hope not.
You are not familiar with the highly probable process known as Prebiotic chemical evolution, where by nonliving structures tend towards a state of homeostasis?
It is a concept given wide spread attention in the study of abiogenesis.
And much of what we have seen in modern Biochem labs owe this explanation greater credence, Namely the Observed and wholly unguided process of the formation of the protocells required constituents.
Irreducible complexity fail.