Top Comments
All Comments (27)
-
Harmonies, melodies, feelings, etc
-
@dutico Yeah, I had seen that video a year or so ago; I was very impressed by her Opera stuff. I wonder what training Aggie had; I wonder if there is a website that gives the bottom line on that.
-
@dutico I'm just passing by, and although you understood my previous message, I have to say I meant to write broader range, not higher range (I guess i was thinking about high notes and Aggie) I'll comeback later and carefully read your recent message.
-
@jjojjorge That is funny they both had good range. It always seemed to me that Frida had more range though lol. She could sing really low, and she could sing super high. Watch the clip when they are singing with Olivia Newton John, to see what I mean. Plus, the one good thing about Frida's voice is that when she switches range, her voice sounds totally different. Like knowing me knowing you, and lets say Super Trouper, she sounds completely different, which showcases her range.
-
@dutico It seems to me they were pretty close when it came to singing; Aggie =) just seemed a bit better with a higher range and perhaps did more with her voice. But again, any abba song that featured more from Frida was better to my ears, so much more melodic. I hope someone gives us some really great insight about their voices.
-
@jjojjorge Totslly agree with you about Frida :). I don't understand what you mean by Aggie being complete tho???...O.o
-
@dutico Personally, I like Frida's Timbre much more; thus sweeter to my ears. But Agnetta is a bit more complete.
-
@jjojjorge rida sounds better live, and that is Frida doing the solo's in this song just fyi
-
Agnetta is really up there with Karen Carpenter - Vocally. Different styles, but really flawless.



incredible song- a very underrated gem ..as with IF IT WASNT FOR THE NIGHTS. this is off their pivotal album. the heights they achieved on this vocally are unsurpassable.
PeteTheStud 2 years ago 7
Look into his angel eyes!
cortieflash 1 year ago