How It All Ends: Mechanics of GCC (pt 1 of 3)

Yea you're right, but have you heard of the polywell reactor concept by the late Rober W Bussard. Maybe he was on to something. Something that could actually be practical.

Yeah, I've heard about it of course, I've made my homework :-). But all of that is still beeing developed. Like I said, it shall take at least 30 years so we can see 1 kWh taken from any fusion reactor. What we need is to find a viable source NOW. Obama's clean Coal can be one, but that won't last forever. There has to be other solutions.

you are awesome, please please keep going, and get some governments around the world to start making some changes!!

right now, as i am typing, i am in an air conditioned room and it is 7:00pm and i am felling very stuffy. can someone explain this? i am not a 45 year old menopausal lady and no, my unit is not malfunctioning. is this a sign of global warming or am I jus an alramist? to those who say dat the sun causes global warmin... venus vs earth. the earth gets more sun yet venus is hotter. Y? explain dat to me.... i am waiting

7pm and it's stuffy with the air conditioner on, I don't know what to tell you, maybe get a bigger air condtioner. Whether or not its a sign of global warming is hard to say.

Venus is closer to the sun, and it's atmosphere is much thicker, it absorbs more of the heat. Also, Venus has a molten surface.

Another reason is that the surface of the earth is mostly covered in water, which has a high specific heat, and will begin to evaporate above a certain temperature. Evaporation cools the planet.

Hey! THis has nothing to do with the compiler!

If we can cause climate change by pumping chemicals into the air... then we can be damn sure we can stop it by pumping different chemicals up. They already try to control weather with cloud busters and bullshit like that. whats stoping us from pumping some reflective shit up there to decrease sunlight?

Who knows? That may very well be a viable option. We don't appear to have the luxury of time to find out. My admittedly limited knowledge of chemistry leads me to doubt that such a solution would really be a "solution." Rather, it would be a treatment to buy us a bit of time until we can find a "cure." I expect it's worth looking into--but not, in my opinion, as an ALTERNATIVE. Instead, as an addition to cutting back on CO2 emissions. We need to cut back NOW while we figure this out.

It's the rate that matters most. In nature, oil takes millions of years to produce; we are consuming it at a much faster rate.