Global warming: serious question?
Top Comments
All Comments (10)
-
let's just laugh that way we don't have3 to dispute his claims which are on record to be true.
-
i agree with his statement
-
Both you and Daniel had great comments.
How can this serious question be laughed at? These are the same people who allow history to repeat itself again and again. How pathetic. This is the worst part of Humanity, we have the right to question what is going on for the safety of ourselves and others. I can just see these people saying in Nazi Germany: "Hitler did not burn his own parliament building you nut-jobs, take away our freedoms, hail Hitler!"
-
i haven't really looked into the global warming conspiracy, but wouldn't you expect the conspiracy to be AGAINST global warming rather than for it? I mean, the major energy and manufacturing industries (and by economic extension their respective governments) hold interests that are hindered by the belief in global warming. Wouldn't you expect the key power players of the world (i.e. international corporations and governments) to be against the belief in global warming? Just my two cents.
-
This Aussie TV station ABC is 100pc Government owned, and seeing Kevin Rudd the current Prime Minsiter is a NWO CFR bum boy, who is charged with Internet Censorship, creating a merged Asian-Pacific Union with one currency, allow mass asian immigration into Australia (who can't speek english and when unemployment is on the rise)..signing Kyoto, brining in Carbon Taxes and getting sheep to buy the lie that Global Warming is real. so debate was HIGHLY CENSORED.
-
Just because the majority are doing something (anything), does that infact make what they are doing RIGHT?
My opinions, and your opinions - if you have one -(informed opinions - not pipe dream ones) should be just as valid as the majorities opinions, the difference to those opinions should not be a target for ridicule. one day perhaps the above subject will also be accepted by the majority, just like Gay and Lesbian is accepted by the majority today.
-
Easy?
He said "i think we should leave that as a Statement, IF we can"
Its a pitty that the audience were too intimidated to actually keep that "Statement" from going on, did I say intimidated ? sorry, I meant UNEDUCATED. Perhaps the majority of the audience would have been less shocked to what must have appeard as a mind bogglingly stupid question if infact they were conditioned to think in any other way from the NORMAL.Remember what NORMAL is?
It seems 2 be whatever the majority are doing
-
Why don't they answer the question?
His comment was laughed at and dismissed but what he said was basically true.
Merany1 3 years ago 10
That is a accurate question. Very Funny??? What should give your more chuckles is that all these people are going to such great lengths to be a part of something that they really know very little about, or what they are promoting and for whom.
DanieljDixon 3 years ago 5