No You Can't (Featuring John Boehner)

No description available.

• Category

  News & Politics

[NiGHTSS01]

HELL NO YOU CAN'T

[ArtieLangeXM]

great video contrasting Democratic hope with bitter white republican obstructionism

[Joe Lackey]

This is one of the many reasons America is in the crapper. Uneducated, ill-informed citizens voting based solely upon the color of his skin. NINETY-THREE PERCENT of blacks in this country voted for Barack. Can anyone tell me why? I can't begin to fathom what uproar there would have been, had it been reported that 93% of whites voted for Romney. Racism is, and will ALWAYS be, a problem in the United States. Sorry, MLK.

[thecp29]

Didn't know tan man could sing..too bad his vocabulary limited.

[John Steel]

PatGund of Fogbow, aka Patrick McKinnion, is a no class liar.

[Cryptonymicus]

Hell yeah we can. And we are.

[davitz77]

Tax cuts have nothing to do with loss of revenue. U.S. Federal Tax revenue went from $1,495B (2012$) in 1980 to $1,874B (2012$) in 1988 (According to the BEA) That's a net increase of 25%. In 2002, Federal Revune was $2,391B (2012$) and INCREASED BY 23.9% in 2007 to $2,962B (2012$) DESPITE the Bush tax cuts... that also went for the Rich, Middle Class and Poor.

and your straw man arguments claim that I want your wife's uterus regulated. "Oh there you go, again."

[QuietReckoning]

Good point. Reagan increased taxes on the middle class instead of the rich. It was George Bush who raised them on rich people, to pay off Reagan's skyrocketing debt. You accuse me of hate and strawman arguments. What hate? What straw men?

[davitz77]

Reagan lowered taxes on the Rich from 70% to 50% then again to 28%. I never said I wanted to control your wife's uterus. I never called this "Obama Capitalism" You have produced nothing but STRAW-MAN and HATE filled arguments rather than fact based data. I would argue with you more, but I fear I may lose my intelligence as I do so. Thank you.

[QuietReckoning]

LOL, are you serious? You're trolling, right? You can't seriously believe that regulations LESS STRICT than the ones Ronald Reagan signed into law are socialist. Ronald Reagan raised taxes on the rich! That was the Middle-Class Tax Revolt! Obama is doing EXACTLY what Ronald Reagan did! Yet you're calling this "Obama Capitalism" rather than doing what worked in the past. You want to control my wife's uterus, and yet I'm the one that wants total control, because I want a few teensy regulations.

[davitz77]

... and I forgot. Obama signed the "lilly led fair pay act" thing. That's not very Capitalistic by controlling workers' pay. Obama wants the FEDERAL government controlling healthcare. That's not Capitalistic. Obama wants to raise taxes on the "wealthy" which so happens to be job creators. That's not Capitalistic. Obama says Capitalism doesn't work ( /watch?v=9qmj4trja7w ). That's not Capitalistic. How am I a Fascist? I want the government out of people's lives COMPLETELY. Obama wants to control.

[davitz77]

If you think that the Democrats are Capitalistic, you're smoking pot. Democrats receive plenty of donations from Big Corporations and Big Labor. Did you know Obama's top donor is Goldman Sachs? Democrats want to control everything but a woman's uterus and they want to jail people for smoking cigarettes and buying soda. Most Republicans want people to be allowed to own weapons. Dems like half the country living at the expense of others who work. Who's the freedom party now?