The Higgs Boson Will Not Be Found (or at least not as a mechanism), Part 1

My problem with The Higgs is really with hidden causal mechanisms in general: the hand of god, curved spacetime, or a field of quanta; for they are all in the image of causation, a metaphor? Physicists don't even have an explanation for causation. Why does energy transfer from one object to the next, when microscopically, their is no contact(continuity)? is it an Intention? are these intentions integrated? why do Physicists insist on reducing the 3 family structure to a hidden causal mechanism, as opposed to trying to integrate this pattern with scales further up the hierarchy of existence??? I say this, because I believe I have discovered what this much larger pattern is, a blueprint for existence, so to speak. Why is this blueprint the case as opposed to not the case, or rather than any other Blueprint? is it what works for making existence, a Teleological Director of sorts? http://www.WayofTheLiteral.com

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Higgs Boson
• Superstrings
• Physics
• M Theory
• Philosophy

[kelbykross1]

i read an article about next tuesday they are supposed to get something from the LHC.

I agree that physicists don't have specific reason for causation, but they are the only ones working on it.

I'm not trying to start a youtube fight or anything, but the typefont on your wayoftheliteral page is really hard to read, and poor graphic design.

Are you a fan of lei groups?

[CammieSpectrum]

@kelbykross1 I'm working on posting stuff soon. physicists have no idea what they are talking about. I know that sounds arrogant, but really science is arrogant. explanation cannot be part of what exists, let alone a hidden causal event. the higgs mechanism, fields of quanta, & hidden mediums are still intended in the image of causal events that exist. this method is circular, never explains causation, reduces new types like Nothing, & prediction does not = understanding what existence is. :)

[kelbykross1]

@CammieSpectrum So your explanation of causation?

a theistic approach of some sort?

[CammieSpectrum]

@kelbykross1Teleological is the best description. existence is directed by a teleological blueprint of sorts(which are the preexistential conditions for existence). Results, that I call Same Sum Before & After and Same Sum Here & There, for Indirect & Indirect Causal Events, are a part of this integrated blueprint. and there is also a preexistential big bang of sorts. it took me nine years so far to come this conclusion. I'd elaborate, but I am in the middle of working on it. please say tuned :)

[TheBoyChur]

@CammieSpectrum they found it ? :)

[CammieSpectrum]

@TheBoyChur I think their going to find is what I call The X Particle(spin 2). I'm going to make a video on it soon. just because they find a heavy particle, does not mean it acts like a hidden causal mechanism that causally gives mass to other particles. the higgs mechanism is what I have a problem with, for it just trades the question of why many masses to why higgs mass with many adjustable variables and it is in the image of ordinary causation, which is already unaccounted for

[CammieSpectrum]

@TheBoyChur actually I think it would need to be spin 0.

[maryamelsherif]

im glad i watched this because ive been mispronouncing Pyragram as PIE-rah-gram. .

[TheBoyChur]

@Buildings1772 well i gues he was wrong then :) , they found it haha

[sahrish786]

are you still thinking that higgs particles is not existed ?????????????