Why haven't we resolved the question of God's existence? After 300 years of heated debate between science and religion, we are no closer to a resolution. Could it be because both sides are taking the same approach to the issue? Could it be that both sides are off track and that the intellect will never determine whether God exists. Instead, only a direct experience can resolve the question for you.
You claimed that this would be a new approach - it isn't. Take away all the apple nonsense and it boils down to "I believe because I have had a mystical experience." That puts you in the same category as every Christian, Jewish, Islamic, Hindu etc.. mystic who has ever lived. Nothing you say could not be attributed to electro-chemical neurological events. I have a nephew who used to hear voices in his head. Since he has been taking antipsychotic drugs they've gone away.
mikelheron20 3 days ago
@Helldog6 not only by means of the heart and the conscience, but also through deduction and logic.
Your Pseudo-Scientific Demagoguery does NOT at all help cure your delusions!
"GTFO."
So much science for this uncivilized brainless pseudo-Scientific Demagogue!
1tabligh 6 days ago
@Helldog6 when all of this is the case, it is surprising that some people turn their backs on scientific principles, primary deductions and propositions based on reflection, and deny the existence of the Creator.
Now, too, in the age of science and technology, when man has found his way into space, a considerable number of scientists have a religious outlook as part of the intellectual system; they have come to believe in the existence of a creator, a source for all beings,
1tabligh 6 days ago
@Helldog6 When the experimental sciences demonstrate that the elements and natural facrtors cannot exert any independent influence and do not possess any creativity; when all of our experiences, our sensory feelings, and our rational deductions point to the conclusion that nothing occurs in nature without a reason and cause and that all phenomena are based on an established system and specific laws,
1tabligh 6 days ago
@1tabligh cool story bro. Prove your go exists or GTFO.
Helldog6 6 days ago
@Helldog6 Any supposable phenomenon in the universe was submerged in the darkness of non-being before it assumed the form of being. It *cannot* pierce the darkness of non-being and step forth on the plain of being as an existent thing *until* the powerful hand of causality sets to work.
1tabligh 6 days ago
@1tabligh Now your just repeating yourself. I've already shown this argument to be false. Prove your god... or GTFO.
Helldog6 6 days ago
What kind of accident might it be that from the dawn of being to the present has guided the infinite interactions of all things, in so wondrous, precise and orderly a fashion?
Can the order we perceive be the reflection of mere accident and happenstance?
Materialism looks at the world with one eye *closed* and, as a result, is unable to answer numerous questions!
Deluded atheist looks at the world with BOTH eyes *closed* and, as a result, are unable to answer ALL the questions!
1tabligh 6 days ago
@1tabligh lol. Your right. Everything happens with a cause. But that doesn't suddenly deem it this "causation" to be from the hand or work of god. Yes... everything is going to have a cause. So whats the cause of your god? And again.... wheres the proof. You still have yet to provide any. Stupid brainless cuckoo Muslim with an asinine belief system that he can't prove.
Helldog6 6 days ago
@Helldog6 Are you that mentally insufficient
___
Imprisoned as we are within the four walls of matter, we *never* encounter anything accidental in life, and, indeed, no one ever encountered, in the history of the world, an accident *not* arising from a cause. Were this not the case, we might have an excuse for regarding the universe as accidental in origin. ....
Stupid brainless cuckoo atheist with asinine mind!
1tabligh 6 days ago