New Discovery Invalidates The Big Bang

This video highlights a recent discovery that invalidates our ideas of expanding space and the "Big Bang".

For more information on how we know the Big Bang never happened, check out the Thunderbolts project at http://www.thunderbolts.info or visit my personal site at http://sites.google.com/site/cosmologyquest/default

You can also watch a full feature length video on the subject at:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4773590301316220374&q=electric+un...

This video and my web site are not affiliated with the Thunderbolts project.

Some published papers on the subject:

http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0203466

We present new spectroscopic observations of an old case of anomalous redshift--NGC 7603 and its companion. The redshifts of the two galaxies which are apparently connected by a luminous filament are z=0.029 and z=0.057 respectively. We show that in the luminous filament there are two compact emission line objects with z=0.243 and z=0.391. They lie exactly on the line traced by the filament connecting the galaxies. As far as we are aware, this is the most impressive case of a system of anomalous redshifts discovered so far.

http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0401147v1

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• NGC7603
• Halton
• Arp
• Corredoira
• Gutierrez
• Redshift
• Galaxy
• Quasar
• Connected
• Universe
• Cosmology
• Astronomy
• Big
• Bang
• Expanding
• Space
• Thunderbolts
• Plasma
• Electric
• Saturn
• Hubble
• Law

[Thaimiles]

And...I look forward to all your silly responses, or not.

[Thaimiles]

Oh, sure! That video proves a lot...NOT! Guess you have to be a 'rocket scientist' to get it. Who really cares?!? Seriously. What does it matter if there was or wasn't a Big Bang? Not losing sleep over here, HaHa!

[DiogenesofCalgary]

Yes Hubble's law has failed. Red shift is a result of the lens effect of the dark matter of our galaxy and in the case you are citing perhaps the dark matter in the galaxy you are looking at is also red shifting the smaller black hole to make it appear even further away, when in fact it is within the same dark matter for that galaxy. I would think that your evidence would support my idea of dark matter having an index of refraction as show by the Opera experiment.

[scowi3]

www_thunderbolts_info/tpod/201­1/arch11/110329redshifts_htm

...replace _ with .

[scowi3]

Btw, i'd say this observation makes for a more damning contradiction of big bang theory...

www_thunderbolts_infotpod/2011­/arch11/110329redshifts_htm

[scowi3]

The big bang theory relies on the assumption that galactic redshifts are a doppler effect caused by expanding space. It is quite possible, however, that they are instead a scattering effect. Light may simply be losing energy from it's interaction with matter in the intergalactic medium. In this case, the high redshifts of quasars would be partly due to the dense envelope of gases that encompass them, giving them an intrinsic non-cosmological (i.e. non-distance-related) redshift.

[Ech0es71]

Now that I think of it, the big bang theory actually sounds quite silly. I read somewhere that it was once proposed, similarly, in a theory espoused by a Catholic clergyman. It is childlike and fantasy oriented to think that magic can happen where things spontaneously appear (ie - the big bang). Science itself has disproved this type of magical behavior - magicians cant really find a relevant audience anymore, either can big bang theorists.

[BlankVellum]

@doltBmB No, it doesn't. My goodness me, is this some sort of advanced satire? Or maybe you get a thrill out of pretending to be stupid. But, just for fun, explain why relativity prohibits the doppler shifting of light, DESPITE the fact that it is used on a regular basis in the form of light guns and so forth.

[doltBmB]

@BlankVellum Think for a second. Here's a hint: relativity prohibits doppler shifting of light.

[BlankVellum]

@doltBmB No, it is not self evident at all. Saying something wrong over and over again does not make it less wrong by the way. The observed shift of galaxies towards the red end of the spectrum over a suitably large distance (many megaparsecs) implies the universe is expanding. Galaxies twice as far away from ours are redshifted twice as much, implying the universe is expanding. Extrapolate this backwards and you will find that at one time all the galaxies where on top of each other.