Black Holes Don't Exist!

Episode 1: "What Are Black Holes?"

This is a first episode of a series about why Black Holes don't exist. Artist renditions are discussed and compared to alleged evidence for the existence of black holes. Also evidence is shown that defies the laws of relativity!

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Theory
• Black Hole
• Stellar
• Space
• Physics
• Cosmology

[danielbluesmoke]

Dude, you just proved that dictionary definitions of black holes, and artists renderings are wrong! Not that black holes don't exist! There are very good reasons a black hole would emit light, and long jets of matter! Nothing can escape a black hole pass the event horizon, and therefore a black hole is black and cannot be seen. But matter near the event horizon is accelerated to the speed of light, and therefore emits energy! That matter is outside the black hole!

[LokiCocola]

Do you think that your right and basically the whole scientific community is wrong

[pinoychannel1]

Every available thing we know might be none are correct in the law of the universe.

[ThreeFangCat]

Two things:

(1) Scientifically, artist's depictions are irrelevant. Comparisons to them are equally irrelevant.

(2) "I still have my doubts, though," is not a scientific counter-argument. It's a dismissal.

[rubberdown1969]

@MaestroJah Actually Quasars are not the extremely bright most distant objects as claimed, they have been observed & photographed linked by plasma bridges to some nearby galaxies & even in front of opaque lower redshifted nearby galaxies so redshift is not soley due to recessional velocity as assumed & quasars are not super bright & extremely distant. Most of what we observe can be explained easily in electrical terms & is in fact expected.

[MaestroJah]

@rubberdown1969 While I agree with you on the bias of the scientific paradigm, I must say, I've seen those videos too... No one has ever witnessed a star being born- quasars are too far away to discern any definite structure, as the name implies- quasar being short for quasi-stellar object. But I am curious- what is your vocation? Physics is a hobby for me, as I cannot dedicate enough time to this pursuit to acheive any real meaningful contributions. I am a millwright/operator myself.

[rubberdown1969]

@MaestroJah Supernovas are exploding double layers in an EM circuit not a star exploding, neutron stars(pulsars) cant exist for the same reasons BH cant & that is the atoms EM is far stronger than any gravity can compress regardless of size, pulsars are a strobe effect, we do witness stars being born in quasars in which some are nearby protogalaxies ejected from a parent galaxy,science of late is nothing to be proud of when agendas & funding are more important than emperical science

[MaestroJah]

@rubberdown1969 99%- that's the thing. There's a lot left unexplained, but there it is still. Supernovae, "neutron" stars,... The fact that no one has ever witnessed a star being born! It is the religion of science. And science has become less about finding truth and more about explaining away the existence of God. But like you say, sometimes there ARE explanations, but stubborn, proud science won't accept that maybe their first theory was wrong- and besides, the books are already printed.

[rubberdown1969]

@MaestroJah its an assumption the sun has a fusion core though most of the evidence indicates it hasnt,reverse thermal gradient,existance of carona,sunspots being dark,lack of neutrinos etc,also electromagnetism easily holds the galaxy together,accounts for its spin rate without gravity which is 10~39 times weaker than electromagnesism, it is that that is overlooked when posturing there is dark stuff we cant detect, with EM none of it is needed space is 99% plasma & obeys known laws

[doodoohead39]

Retard