YouTube home Comedy Week on YouTube
Upload

Life as Evolving Software, Greg Chaitin at PPGC UFRGS

PPGCInfUFRGS PPGCInfUFRGS·3 videos
24
4,884
Like     Dislike 0

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like PPGCInfUFRGS's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike PPGCInfUFRGS's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add PPGCInfUFRGS's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Sep 1, 2011

Few people remember Turing's work on pattern formation in biology (morphogenesis), but Turing's famous 1936 paper On Computable Numbers exerted an immense influence on the birth of molecular biology indirectly, through the work of John von Neumann on self-reproducing automata, which influenced Sydney Brenner who in turn influenced Francis Crick, the Crick of Watson and Crick, the discoverers of the molecular structure of DNA. Furthermore, von Neumann's application of Turing's ideas to biology is beautifully supported by recent work on evo-devo (evolutionary developmental biology). The crucial idea: DNA is multi-billion year old software, but we could not recognize it as such before Turing's 1936 paper, which according to von Neumann creates the idea of computer hardware and software.

  • Category

  • License

    Standard YouTube License

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Top Comments

  • TheMarcusrobbins

    We are the music makers,

    And we are the dreamers of dreams,

    Wandering by lone sea-breakers,

    And sitting by desolate streams;—

    World-losers and world-forsakers,

    On whom the pale moon gleams:

    Yet we are the movers and shakers

    Of the world for ever, it seems.

    · 4

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate TheMarcusrobbins's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate TheMarcusrobbins's comment.
  • Nick Santoianni

    @gjchaitin I read your book!!! It's awesome I really enjoyed learning about your theory, I'm a construction worker but I LOVE biology, I didn't think math and bio would ever make a lot of sense but surprisingly it does, really opened my eyes to a whole new way of thinking great job!

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Nick Santoianni's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Nick Santoianni's comment.

All Comments (9)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • ler523

    So, is the World an evolving software as well? That's why we can never know it, because the World as a whole final and perfect piece with static laws doesn't exist. It's on the move forever as well as math?!

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ler523's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ler523's comment.
    in reply to gjchaitin (Show the comment)
  • gjchaitin

    For an expanded version of this lecture, please see my little book "Proving Darwin: Making Biology Mathematical" published by Pantheon in May of 2012.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate gjchaitin's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate gjchaitin's comment.
  • 65nom

    evolution too slow argument - For a single mathematical organism sure..

    Now remember that there's parallelism.. and sex, so take a billion bitstreams each with a random mutation, and also allow them to combine results.. (sex)

    make it perfect sex, so allow a function to xor two programs and pick the best permutation.. perhaps with some limit say no more than 8 bits of difference.. so 256 "children" leads to speciation... when progs too incompatible !

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate 65nom's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate 65nom's comment.
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later