Thinking Philosophy
Uploader Comments (mpenseli)
All Comments (35)
-
The Art of Worldly Wisdom, by Balthasar Gracian
-
Try reading the social and political ideas of Karl Marx and Fredrich Engels
-
Start with Socrates for the insight (thinking is what we do). Plato for the interesting idea, Aristotle to make it reasonable or not. Heidegger for a space for thinking. Spinoza for the self. Descartes for the false authority of mind. Nietzsche for the need of ego. Foucault for our terminal existentialism: Kant for the foundation of Philosophy (categories), Hegel for emotional issues in thinking, Wittgenstein to agree on the game and Derrida to deconstruct and keep it interesting an futile.
-
Start with Socrates, Plato and Aristotle and 8 other early Greeks - Heidegger, Spinoze, Descartes, Nietzsche, Foucault, Kant, Hegel, Wittgenstein, and Derrida - in that order.
-
"Beyond freedom and dignity" by BF skinner is an amazing book. I highly recommend it.
-
I know this is very late in the day but JS Mill's "On Liberty" and "Utilitarianism" are interesting, Hare's "moral thinking: it's levels, method and point" and Sidgewick's "Methods of Ethics"
-
Communism won't do you any good. At best it'll leave you feeling that success is shameful and at worst it will lead your country to bloody ruin.
-
The Communist Manifesto is not a philosophical text. Also you can or did read it by now within 2 hours, the Capital, all three volumes takes a shitload of time though.
My advice to begin with analytical philosophy and then work your way back to older texts and systems you have then some tools to dissect.
Cheers.
-
I would recommend beginning with Plato. It SOUNDS extremely daunting and boring, but with the right translation it reads like a play. I recommend Robin Waterfield's translation - and also I recommend starting with the trial and death of Socrates - as they are the most dramatic
-
I agree with some of those that have posted before I, a lot of the titles you listed are [important] historically, but they are difficult or dry reading - especially without studying and understanding the milieu-the context-the particular philosophical conversation taking place with which these works were dialoguing..
I shall certainly be looking these up later on today. Thanks for the informed choices. Keep you posted.
mpenseli 4 years ago