Probabilities - Abiogenesis Gets Owned!

This video hows the amazing probabilities of a protein and a cell forming through evolutionary abiogenesis.
After watching this video, you will see there is absolutely no way that abiogenesis occurred.


{--Since many of my individual videos do not explain why evolution is imagination, I will post the links here: Evolution is scientifically IMPOSSIBLE -- the ultimate disproof: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNdhAYVtaDM ; why there is no mechanism to make entirely new genetic information (thus, evolution would be impossible): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_8v3UJB8Vg ; why the earth was created ex nihilo: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUPFRRTfv58 ; and why radiometric dating is a fallacy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTrXa6WIn1o.--}

Don't forget to add me as a friend if you are anti-evolution!



People seem to be attacking the Mororwitz calculation of 10^340,000,000. It must be understood that he calculated the chance of the SMALLEST CONCEIVABLE living cell forming in an ocean rich in chemicals.
Don't forget to rate the vid, and add it as a favourite if you like it!
As for the probabilities, here they are below:
# OF CALCULATIONS NEEDED TO PRODUCE 1 PROTEIN:
Fact: Proteins are formed every 3 x 10^129 tries [theoretically].
Proof: [100 octillion calculations per second] x [60 sec] x [60 min] x [24 hours] x [365.24 days] x [9 years] x [10 billion years] x [trillion^7 years] = 3 x 10^129
# OF SAND GRAINS IN 10^339,999,970 HOLLOW EARTHS:
Fact: 10^30 sand grains would fit in 1 hollowed out Earth.
Proof: {10^339,999,970 (amount of Earths)} x {10^30 (amount of sand in 1 Earth)} = {10^340,000,000 (amount of sand in 10^339,999,970 Earths)}
# OF UNIVERSES NEEDED TO CONTAIN 10^340,000,000 ATOMS:
Fact: there are 10^80 atoms in 1 universe.
{10^339,999,920 (# of universes needed)} x {10^80 (# of atoms in each universe)} = {10^340,000,000 (# of atoms in all the universes)}

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Dismantling Abiogenesis
• abiogenesis
• response
• creation
• life
• soup
• primordial
• ocean
• chemical
• amino acid
• nucleotide
• darwin
• dawkins
• hovind
• God
• hot topics
• classical music
• clay
• creationism
• debate

[jesse8857]

@BigLundi The atheist must assume the existence of God in order to conclude that God doesn't exist

[jesse8857]

@BigLundi “Our brains have evolved in order to do just that." Basically all atheists admit that thoughts are random chemical movements.(if you don't, tell me) On what basis do you call one false and another true? Whether they are 'highly evolved' is completely irrelevant.

[jesse8857]

@BigLundi "Atheists can know a lot of things" Tell me how you know this. The rest of you comment is basically full of fallacies - especially ad hominem, so I won't respond

[BigLundi]

@jesse8857 5. You have no reason at all to assume God gave you the ability to know and reason other than a bare assertion. 6. You have simply asserted that if our brainns are natural, we can't reason, without any evidence to back that up. Our brains have evolved in order to do just that. There is no problem in the atheistic mindset to...thoughts. Thoughts are explained rather in depth by the neuroscientific and psychplogical fields of science. Dan Dennett has an entire lecture on consciousness.

[BigLundi]

@jesse8857 ...Wow, so many wrong things. 1. the chance isn't 1 in 2 of God designing life. You pulled that out of your ass. 2. No supernatural healing has ever been demonstrated. Show me evidence of such a thing. If you give me Peter Popoff I'll shit myself laughing. 3. Atheists can know a lot of things, thoughts being synapse firings in the brain doesn't change that. 4. The bible isn't a valid place to get knowledge.

[BigLundi]

@jesse8857 In order to conclude what?

[jesse8857]

@BigLundi He must assume the existence of God to be able to conclude this—it is viciously circular to his position!

In both choices, God exists.

[jesse8857]

@BigLundi This proves God even more! Overall, atheists have two choices: CHOICE 1: THERE IS THE ABILITY TO HAVE RESON/LOGIC/KNOWLEDGE. Then there must be a reason/logic/knowledge giver since fizzes of chemicals cannot determine knowledge. Which means that atheists, by definition, cannot choose ‘choice 1.’ CHOICE 2: THERE IS NO ABILITY TO HAVE REASON/LOGIC/KNOWLEDGE. How does the atheist know/reason to this conclusion? See comment 5

[jesse8857]

@BigLundi Theists can reason and have logic since it is revealed to us, such that we can be certain, that this is God’s perfect nature of which we are to imitate. God gives the ability to know and reason. We can trust our thoughts. And so, without God, we could not prove, reason, or know anything. This is the proof of God. And if you say we cannot reason or know anything in order to escape this conclusion, aren’t you using reasoning in that process to come to that decision? See comment 4

[jesse8857]

@BigLundi Atheists cannot know anything (since thoughts are random fizzes of chemicals). [calling something true and another false is like calling coke true and Fanta false – it is stupid. ] In fact, atheists cannot even reason (how do you know your reasoning about something is valid? You don’t.).Theists get our basis for knowledge and reasoning from God and the Bible. Our brains are not simply random movements of chemicals, but were *designed* by God. See comment 3