Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Scalia: Get Over It! (CBS News)

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia tells Lesley Stahl that the 2000 Bush v. Gore decision wasn't political and that folks need to get over it. Stahl's report airs this Sunday at 7 p.m. ET/PT, (CB...  
 
Customize

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

41 ratings
Sign in to rate
19,191 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (234)   Options

Loading...
ExoticGawdess (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 -2
Marked as spam
Scalia represents himself as a total douchebag dufus.

Scalia holds the evil Talmud as a higher law than the US Constitution. He serves Israel. He won't be fair in administering justice. He's evil

Scalia's laws used to decide his cases states: Jews can kill white people without penalty. Jews can kill white people but Anglos cannot injure a Jew. Jews should lie to Anglos. Jews should never warn Anglos of danger.

On 9/11 Jews didn't warn Anglos, Jews danced & filmed Anglos falling from the WTC.
ExoticGawdess (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
Scallia is lame. He takes the law lightly. He's not a real American. Scalia serves Israel and the Zionists. Scalia said he held the evil Talmud as higher law than the US Constitution.

The US Constitution is higher law, it represents several thousand more years of studied thought than does the mystical black magic book of the Talmud that was written by ignorant baby killer while imprisoned in Babylon

Scalia is a moron. He's taken us backwards to ANCIENT times. His law is a baby killers' law.
robislost (3 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Thanks for this idiotic rambling that added nothing of substance to the discussion and is instead full of delusions.
crespogod09 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
All judges are activist in certain respects! Get over it!
jpsartrean (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
Gee, way to cite an impartial source...

(though I concede I am inclined to agree with the assessment)
TheConcernedPatriot (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
i understand the implications of citing AU (which is why i gave the source to begin with).

but for me, the stanglehold the Religious Right has on our politics at the national and state levels is a bigger problem than healthcare, budget concerns, maybe even our wars in the middle east. I'm not even a "liberal" - other than in perhaps the classic sense. Separation of Church and State benefits both sides of the equation, regardless of what the James Dobson brigade is trying to sell us.
TheConcernedPatriot (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
imo the evangelical arm of the GOP is a clear and present danger to the liberties ensured by the first ammendment. it is an impediment to science and education. This IS NOT the big tent GOP of Eisenhower or the limited govt GOP of Goldwater. The party has been hijacked by fearmongers who valorize ignorance.
pmango1000 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
concered: LOL...you dont know the definition of activist judge then
TheConcernedPatriot (1 month ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
well by all means, fill me in. as near as I can tell, the term "activist judge" has little meaning outside of an epithet for a judge whose rulings the Right disagrees with. Well, I'm saying Scalia's disregard for precedents on the seperation of church & state have often pushed him into the category of activist judge imho.
robislost (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Not true. The precedents on the separation of church and state are in violation of the intent of the First Amendment. That doesn't make him an activist, it made Hugo Black an activist.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.