Non comparing because showing not crashes of planes into buildings like Amsterdam 1992 or Iran 2005, why not? 7) They come with the cams again and that FBI confiscated and never had released. Fact is, no one asked about cam type, for example the traffic cams have by fact very low fps and would have lesser filmed as the video from gate cam.
Enough about vid told, or shall I go further? Again only the same sedition story as always and sad that people believe this truther BS really!
1)“A boing 757 weighting 80ton”: Real truth = 99.7tons, ER = 115tons (source Wikipedia). 2) Destruction span at 0:39 clear visible that far more as claimed 15ft in ground floor. 3)“Intact windows”, no word that in fact they were armoured glass, why? 4) Naming a dozen people telling no plane, concealing over 100 telling it was a plane, why? 5) Ignoring that wings are like knifes and fold inside / back to hull 6) Showing non comparing crashes as examples here
In case someone should be surprised by the capability of resistance of the P building... The side which was hit was already reinforced because they were implementing the lessons learned of the Oklahoma City incident of 1995.
And how the durability of a reinforced building can be indicate the footage of the Kenyan embassy incidence in 1998 where the embassy building structure stayed nearly fully intact while some meters away a not specially reinforced building collapsed completely.
@MettiSNSD no u didnt, but the video we are posting under does.i agree that the taxi driver thing is questionable. but that the us government is competent enough to pull off a deception on this scale? dosn't seem very likely does it? well not to me anyway. ive seen so many truthers claims refuted,fake planes,fake phone calls bombs in the buildings etc. it leaves them with next to no credibility. theres a bbc documentry called 9/11 conspiricy road trip. its worth watching. peace.
@MettiSNSD 9.11 has thousands of for and against ideas/videos/opinions/theories towards 9/11 being a conspiracy..with all the things ive watched ( both for/against)..and gathered to make opinions for myself..just like ur doing..the for ( that being an inside job ) overwhelmes the against. im not fueding with u..just a sharing opinions, peace.
@MettiSNSD i never once said there was a missile involed..just going by a documentry i watched..where the witnesses reports all went against the offical report..regarding the planes flight path towards the pentagon..it seems weird that the official report would lie about the path of the flight..isnt it? also i mentioned how the guy whose taxi got hit by a pole..admits to it being staged...i mean that alone..make sthe whole situation questionable doesnt it?
@MettiSNSD do you really think all those people would have kept their mouths shut for the last 10 years? take a look at the passenger list, just ordinary people going about their daily lives. gone. no contact with their families/freinds etc. if it was a missile where are they? isnt it reasonable to assume that at least one of them would have broken cover?im no expert, just an ordinary person who is amazed at the lies that people can convince themselves of. peace.
@MettiSNSD havnt seen the documentry with the cab driver, but i'll have a look.but it dosnt detract from my point,the witnesses the rescue workers the wreckage and body parts of the passengers? how are they to be explained?16foot round hole? what do u expect to be left of the plane when it has disintegrated and travelled through 3 office buildings at 500 mph?if it wasnt a plane, what happened to the passengers and crew? think about how many people would have to be involved in a conspiricy ..cont
@lewismclinton ur right about witnesses seeing the plane approach the pentagon..allbeit not 190 plus people..no need to exaggerate..and the witnesses stories all contradict the offical report of the pentagon ( albeit just the path of the flight..)..and you mention the cab driver..ive watched a documentry..where the man himself admits that pole hitting his cab was staged..in order to find the truth..you have to know where to look. peace
@Mandelus71
Well written and showing the truth behind this BS of truther evidence and explaining!
In fact it is a good example to expose the truth behind truther movement!
xTiger2Bx 1 month ago
Cont.:
Non comparing because showing not crashes of planes into buildings like Amsterdam 1992 or Iran 2005, why not? 7) They come with the cams again and that FBI confiscated and never had released. Fact is, no one asked about cam type, for example the traffic cams have by fact very low fps and would have lesser filmed as the video from gate cam.
Enough about vid told, or shall I go further? Again only the same sedition story as always and sad that people believe this truther BS really!
Mandelus71 1 month ago 2
Again truther sedition here!
1)“A boing 757 weighting 80ton”: Real truth = 99.7tons, ER = 115tons (source Wikipedia). 2) Destruction span at 0:39 clear visible that far more as claimed 15ft in ground floor. 3)“Intact windows”, no word that in fact they were armoured glass, why? 4) Naming a dozen people telling no plane, concealing over 100 telling it was a plane, why? 5) Ignoring that wings are like knifes and fold inside / back to hull 6) Showing non comparing crashes as examples here
-1-
Mandelus71 1 month ago 2
In case someone should be surprised by the capability of resistance of the P building... The side which was hit was already reinforced because they were implementing the lessons learned of the Oklahoma City incident of 1995.
And how the durability of a reinforced building can be indicate the footage of the Kenyan embassy incidence in 1998 where the embassy building structure stayed nearly fully intact while some meters away a not specially reinforced building collapsed completely.
hammondtree 1 month ago
@MettiSNSD no u didnt, but the video we are posting under does.i agree that the taxi driver thing is questionable. but that the us government is competent enough to pull off a deception on this scale? dosn't seem very likely does it? well not to me anyway. ive seen so many truthers claims refuted,fake planes,fake phone calls bombs in the buildings etc. it leaves them with next to no credibility. theres a bbc documentry called 9/11 conspiricy road trip. its worth watching. peace.
lewismclinton 2 months ago
@MettiSNSD 9.11 has thousands of for and against ideas/videos/opinions/theories towards 9/11 being a conspiracy..with all the things ive watched ( both for/against)..and gathered to make opinions for myself..just like ur doing..the for ( that being an inside job ) overwhelmes the against. im not fueding with u..just a sharing opinions, peace.
MettiSNSD 2 months ago
@MettiSNSD i never once said there was a missile involed..just going by a documentry i watched..where the witnesses reports all went against the offical report..regarding the planes flight path towards the pentagon..it seems weird that the official report would lie about the path of the flight..isnt it? also i mentioned how the guy whose taxi got hit by a pole..admits to it being staged...i mean that alone..make sthe whole situation questionable doesnt it?
MettiSNSD 2 months ago
@MettiSNSD do you really think all those people would have kept their mouths shut for the last 10 years? take a look at the passenger list, just ordinary people going about their daily lives. gone. no contact with their families/freinds etc. if it was a missile where are they? isnt it reasonable to assume that at least one of them would have broken cover?im no expert, just an ordinary person who is amazed at the lies that people can convince themselves of. peace.
lewismclinton 2 months ago
@MettiSNSD havnt seen the documentry with the cab driver, but i'll have a look.but it dosnt detract from my point,the witnesses the rescue workers the wreckage and body parts of the passengers? how are they to be explained?16foot round hole? what do u expect to be left of the plane when it has disintegrated and travelled through 3 office buildings at 500 mph?if it wasnt a plane, what happened to the passengers and crew? think about how many people would have to be involved in a conspiricy ..cont
lewismclinton 2 months ago
@lewismclinton ur right about witnesses seeing the plane approach the pentagon..allbeit not 190 plus people..no need to exaggerate..and the witnesses stories all contradict the offical report of the pentagon ( albeit just the path of the flight..)..and you mention the cab driver..ive watched a documentry..where the man himself admits that pole hitting his cab was staged..in order to find the truth..you have to know where to look. peace
MettiSNSD 2 months ago