Pot activist praises Keene PD handling of 420 events - NH

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,971
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 13, 2009

Sponsor: http://HomelandStupidity.US - Keene police get praise from unlikely quarter during marijuana civil disobedience. But did the events which followed change their status?

Want to help the New Hampshire liberty movement? Visit:
http://nhunderground.com/forum/index.php?topic=17486.0

Or buy an ad on the Ridley Report:
http://RidleyReport.com/Ad

Emery canada extradition prision jail protests police cops demonstrations ridleyreport liberty nh, dave ridley report homeland security prince of pot smoking smoke-out smokeout hot-box hotbox liberty libertarian ron paul pot free state project 420 celebrations keene new hampshire marijuana cannabis hemp mark emory.

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • who is the girl next to Sam... SEXY!

  • Mate, in order to prevent corruption and tyranny. All gov't officials (INCLUDING COPS) have to take an Oath of Office. That Oath of Office, and Position of Public Trust, puts them in a position as a Public Servant. To Serve the Public! They are always to be in a position envying the public, otherwise corruption and tyranny reigns supreme. THAT was part of the checks and balances put into place to prevent tyranny. Problem is, too many people like you allow them to be ignorant of this fact!

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (38)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @davyjames I like her little knapsack on her hip. :3

  • I'm not defending any individual wars.

    But I'm saying there is a huge difference between killing during wartime and killing within your own society.

  • Nor are there any laws that stopped Bush from invading Iraq. It was in fact the laws which allowed them to do this without proper evedence nor a referendum.

  • There are laws against crime, so no, crime doesn't threaten an entire society because laws exist to deal with it.

    Laws weren't around to keep Hitler from invading Poland, or Saddam from invading Kuwait. If you can't stop such aggressive actions with laws, what other means besides the military do you have?

  • This is the problem; this is when double standards come into play.

    Does crime not count as a threat to the entire society? I certainly don't plan on abandoning my neighbours if they are burgled... or any person for that matter. Which means that some killings are justified as defence of life.

    But given that the army is only capable of broad actions, or to use a term in the UK, a sledge hammer to crack a nut. Do you think that it is impossible for them to leave innocent people untouched?

  • I'm not defending all wars or individual wars. I am, however, distinguishing between the murdering of the innocent (assuming that most domestic murders are without justification) and the killing of those who have made threats to your entire society.

  • When was the last time America was invaded? However it has invaded Afghanistan and Iraq and there were no WMDs.

  • If you can't tell the difference between a man murdering his wife and a soldier killing an invading enemy, I really can't help you.

  • That's okay, I'd rather be free of being a smelly redneck farmer.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more