TheAtheistAntidote and Dishonesty
Uploader Comments (antybu86)
Top Comments
-
Well, yeah. Evolution has nothing to do with the origins of the universe, the earth, or life itself. Gradual change in the genetic make-up of organisms in response to environmental changes, accounting for the diversity of life on Earth is all it is.
Attempting to lump cosmology, abiogenesis, and social philosophies in with the theory is rather annoying when people do it, is it not?
Video Responses
All Comments (230)
-
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
-
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living and reproducing if their vital structures, organs, reproductive systems hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species
-
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe works don’t mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell, the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when no directing code or mechanisms existed in nature?
-
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or a cell works, but it's irrational to believe that mere undirected natural laws can bring about either. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
-
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Why are there not billions of the supposed "links"? Why is it SO hard to find a match, so far there are no HUMAN connections......just ideas. Just more monkeys.
LordWhorfinX 2 years ago
Again, LWX, I listed about a dozen "links" in human evolution in this video alone. There are plenty of transitional fossils between humans and our primitive ancestors. You just have to open your eyes and look at them instead of shutting them and repeating over and over "there are no transitional fossils! there are no transitional fossils! there are no transitional fossils!" - doing this wont make them disappear.
antybu86 2 years ago 16