Alex Covers Fox News Hit Piece Against Jesse Ventura & 9/11 Truth on Alex Jones Tv 1/4

Bombshell: Silverstein Wanted To Demolish Building 7 On 9/11




Paul Joseph Watson
http://www.prisonplanet.com
Friday, April 23, 2010

Preface from Alex Jones: To truly grasp the magnitude of this story, you really have to read the entire article. Immediately after the pull it controversy, debunkers claimed there was no plan to conduct a controlled demolition of the building. Now the fact that officials were considering blowing up the building is established, Silversteins consistent denial that this took place is a huge smoking gun. How did Silverstein expect to demolish the building safely when such a process takes weeks or even months to properly set up, even without the additional chaos surrounding WTC 7 on 9/11? How could explosives have been correctly placed on such short notice inside a burning building that had already been evacuated unless the explosives were already in place? This new revelation is astounding and it needs to be investigated immediately.

A Fox News hit piece against Jesse Ventura and the 9/11 truth movement written by former Washington D.C. prosecutor Jeffrey Scott Shapiro inadvertently reveals a shocking truth, that World Trade Center leaseholder Larry Silverstein, who collected nearly $500 million dollars in insurance as a result of the collapse of Building 7, a 47-story structure that was not hit by a plane but collapsed within seven seconds on September 11, was on the phone to his insurance carrier attempting to convince them that the building should be brought down via controlled demolition.

Writing for Fox News, Jeffrey Scott Shapiro states, I was working as a journalist for Gannett News at Ground Zero that day, and I remember very clearly what I saw and heard.

Shortly before the building collapsed, several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers told me that Larry Silverstein, the property developer of One World Financial Center was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building since its foundation was already unstable and expected to fall.

In February of 2002 Silverstein Properties won $861 million from Industrial Risk Insurers to rebuild on the site of WTC 7. Silverstein Properties estimated investment in WTC 7 was $386 million. This buildings collapse alone resulted in a payout of nearly $500 million, based on the contention that it was an unforeseen accidental event.

A controlled demolition would have minimized the damage caused by the buildings imminent collapse and potentially save lives. Many law enforcement personnel, firefighters and other journalists were aware of this possible option. There was no secret. There was no conspiracy, writes Shapiro.

http://www.infowars.com/bombshell-silverstein-wanted-to-demolish-building-7-o...

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• 9/11
• larry
• silverstein
• building
• world
• trade
• center
• pull
• it
• false
• flag
• event
• alex
• jones
• endgame
• infowars.com
• police
• state
• the
• rise
• of
• fema

[labtec514]

@Standard999999 rofl keep looking like a retard

[labtec514]

@Standard999999 rofl calling me a moron when you think that the US government had anything to do with 9/11

[mattdrobnick]

@labtec514

not necessarily. I see two possibilities.

1. He is an instrument aimed at devaluing the truth he actually exposes through somewhat kooky, off-kilter measures (i.e. his presentation). He has an alarmist, cry wolf personality that could very well be yet another piece of the puzzle. It would not surprise me, but, it seems too far fetched.

2. He is not an instrument, and because of how he is perceived, he cannot garner the proper support necessary. He is not yet a viable threat.

[labtec514]

@steviebrochdale So you're not a sheep following someone who was debunked years ago as being a complete retard and making shit up? No doubt you're one of these people that looks at a group of people and thinks you're the only non-conformist and everyone's a sheep.

[steviebrochdale]

@labtec514 just keep watching fox news you sheep!

[steviebrochdale]

@labtec514 so, what about the bank of america building? one of the towers fell onto it and yet it did not collapse . so why did building 7 which was NOT hit by a plane or any substantial debris fall down in a perfect example of controlled demolition. please answer that, since you have all the answers...

[FitnessMinded]

Is it me or is Ron Paul not a mason? I think all of these 'conspiracy' guys are in on it. Why does the "Powers That Be" allow these "truthers" to have so much media time? i don't trust it

[labtec514]

@steviebrochdale Well you see when buildings come down you tend to get something called debris which can hit other objects, which I know is completely shocking, and when you get tons of stuff coming on top of a building it's going to fall.

[steviebrochdale]

@labtec514 It was actually two 767s that hit the towers. However, No plane hit wtc building 7 and yet it collapsed into its own footprint. Please explain...