WI STATE TROOPERS USE PHYSICAL FORCE AGAINST PEACEFUL PROTESTERS; WALKER BORDERS DOMESTIC TERRORISM

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
56,839
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 9, 2011

**Disclaimer: Please watch this link FIRST, as it shows the beginning of this whole scene. Note the people are entering the doors single file. (this is a video of the people entering) .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSMKRI7ryKc

This video is raw, uncensored, and emotionally charged. This is how the event occurred. Not all troopers participated in the event. The girl elicits a true emotional reaction after being shoved by a trooper, and the professionalism of the 2nd trooper in the scene is demonstrated via restraint.

Also: all comments for the site were banned as the majority consisted of: racist / homophobic / sexist remarks, threats of violence, threats of death. We WILL NOT tolerate hate. This video is not put up in hate. The troopers have no choice but to follow walker's command, despite the deputy sheriff announcing he will not support walker. Get your facts right! Google multiple news sources before you form your opinions. The Madison Movement is about PEACE. There have been NO ACTS of violence here and we want to keep it that way. This just shows Walker's edicts crossing a huge line by coercing civilians with physically strong-armed tactics. The doors were opened completely minutes later . The people won. **

Protesters legally and peacefully enter Capitol calling for "no-violence" and to "walk-in"; State Troopers (NOT police) acting under Walker's orders use physical force to blockade both exiting and entering demonstrators, including shoving a girl, dragging a man by his ankles, and forcing people to the ground; behavior is bordering on USA's definition of domestic terrorism (Section 802 of the USA PATRIOT Act (Pub. L. No. 107-52)), which includes acts that are a violation of the criminal laws of a state or the United States, if the act appears to be intended to: (i) intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion.

  • likes, 93 dislikes

All Comments

Adding comments has been disabled for this video.

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more