Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Texans @ Titans highlights

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
12,514
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 20, 2009

No description available.

Category:

Sports

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Andre Johnson is a BEAST

  • The rule In a nutshell:

    Once fair catch is called, you cannot interfere with the player while he is recieveing the ball. He is considered "bobbling" the reception, until the ball hits the ground then it becomes live, it which you see it didn't. I was a long snapper in college and we learned of that rule on top of giving "halo" space.

    WAR Texans!!! Jags are dead!! here we come 2-1!!

see all

All Comments (40)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i remember this game it was ob my bday!!! esily on my top 5 best texans game along with the 8 one with green bay 09 with new england and this year with the bengals (TJ game winning drive)

  • i had chris johnson and andre johnson for my fantasy team during this season....they both got like 40 points per game lol

  • @Eclipton I don't buy that and most of the other people didn't buy that either

  • @icecru2 Well it doesn't matter. If the ref said inconclusive, then his ruling is final. He didn't see any conclusive evidence within 90 seconds, so by rule, the call couldn't be overturned.

  • @Eclipton no i saw it on tv.

    I'm a titan fan.

    and those angles showed that the ball hit the ground

  • @icecru2 That may be the case, but remember, if you have multiple angles that clearly contradict each other, by definition, it's inconclusive. If you saw the game on TV, which you probably didn't, you'd see that while the angle you see in this video confirms what you said, other angles shown on TV clearly shows the ball didn't touch the ground. And remember, if there's no conclusive evidence found either way within 90 seconds, the call automatically stands.

  • @Eclipton Oh no Sir! pause @1:53

    Hand on side of ball with no control.

    Ball also on the ground, it seems as if he's trying to recover a fumble.

    Its incomplete

  • @icecru2 If you saw the other angles during the game, you'd see that the ball never touched the ground. By rule, if the ball comes loose when you're going to the ground but you regain posession before it hits the ground, it's still a catch.

  • @cRaZyRider907 No, remember what happened to Calvin Johnson last year?

    That shoud've been incomplete. cheating refs

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more