Highlights of game 6 of the 2004 Stanley Cup Finals between the Tampa Bay Lightning and Calgary Flames. This package includes the Martin Gelinas so-called no goal.
Regardless of whether or not the puck was in, the NHL still should have called a stop to the game and reviewed it up in Toronto. They do that all the time. There was no excuse not to review, especially in the Stanley Cup finals.
@theicnerd1 Especially since the Canucks may very well be headed back to the Stanley Cup finals. They just have to start Corey Schneider if they have to face the Bruins again.
Regardless of whether or not the puck was in, the NHL still should have called a stop to the game and reviewed it up in Toronto. They do that all the time. There was no excuse not to review, especially in the Stanley Cup finals.
BryantFinlay 2 days ago
@theicnerd1 Especially since the Canucks may very well be headed back to the Stanley Cup finals. They just have to start Corey Schneider if they have to face the Bruins again.
BryantFinlay 2 days ago
can't you dumbasses tell it wasnt a kicking motion flames should have won that game and the refs are dumb
XxFobuLicousXx 4 days ago
Absolutely no proof the puck was in. None. Get over it Flames fans. You'll be back there before you... shit. I forgot the Flames suck dick.
mikeystaubin 5 days ago
That goal was in ! I can't believe they didn't review that .
johnjugovic 2 weeks ago
Typical Flames fans - they'll try to take any greasy goal they can get away with lol!
RedPaladin 2 weeks ago
Damn good quality
danglesnipecelly13 1 month ago
good quality
secretagentsir 1 month ago