Porsche Cayenne Turbo vs GSR 600 vs Range Rover Supercharged
Top Comments
All Comments (58)
-
Porsche vs gsr 600 vs Range Rover vs F16 jet vs Millennium Falcon
-
@P0dDels i just dont get why range rover needs a supercharger if its not suppose to go fast.
-
Why don't you understand? A Range Rover isn't fast. Go and buy yourself a Ferrari or a Lambo if you want to go fast.
-
@P0dDels comfort/cruising and powerful dont match. btw even wid that supercharger in the range rover, its slow as hell.
-
It needs to be supercharged because people want to own powerful cars. If you want to go fast, you'll never buy a Range Rover lol
-
@P0dDels if speed isnt interesting, then why it needs to be supercharged.
-
You got no idea of a Range Rover. It's style and history. Speed isn't interesting for sbdy who's driving a Range. Those people like comfort and cruising.
-
Actually , in the offroad test Cayenne beat Rangerover
-
range rover looks so squarish and ugly. it has aerodynamics of a hippo. its only good when its off road, but horrible in looks and speed. would u go to work or take kids to school by off road? i dont think so.
-
@Scottwax your brain is a POS because the range rover is a off road car its not for racing and range rover break really rarely. i like the cayenne to
why the bike in the race, doesn't fit into the category
mohsin19999995 2 years ago 26
range rover is fucking slow its no match to the turbo its like 0-60 in 7.+ lol! non supercharged goes like 8.+ top speed 140 thats like a cayenne normal
carGT111 2 years ago 9